|
|
|
|
Ȩ > ÇÐȸÁö > ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç |
|
|
|
|
Á¦¸ñ |
¿µ¾î SMS ¾à¾î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇüÅ·ÐÀû ºÐ¼® |
ÀúÀÚ |
°¼®±Ù¡¤¾ç¼±±â |
±Ç / È£ |
23±Ç / 2È£ |
Ãâó |
37-51 |
³í¹®°ÔÀçÀÏ |
2015.06.30. |
ÃÊ·Ï |
Kang, Seok-keun & Yang, Seon-ki. (2015). A Morphological Analysis of English SMS abbreviations. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 23(2), 37-51. The purpose of this paper is to survey English abbreviations that are currently used in text messaging and online chat, and to provide a morphological account of them. To this end, we collected 1159 data with morphological properties from five online dictionaries and five websites/blogs, and analyzed them by the processes by which they were formed. The results showed that about 92.49% of all the data were initialisms. Compared with initialism, word-formational processes such as blending, clipping, onomatopoeia etc. were relatively infrequently used to make SMS abbreviations. Clipped words accounted for only 4.06% (47 words) of the collected data, which was followed by onomatopoeia/mimetic words (0.69%), symbols (0.51%) and blends (0.43%). This analysis shows a rather different result from previous analyses (Kumar 2012; Anjaneyulu 2013)
|
÷ºÎ |
|
|
3.°¼®±Ù ¾ç¼±±â.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|