|
|
 |
 |
홈 > 학술대회 > 학술대회 발표논문집 |
|
| |
| |
 |
| |
| |
| 제목 |
자질이론과 영어의 부정자질 |
|
| 저자 |
홍 성 심 |
년도 |
|
시기 |
|
|
| 출처 |
|
|
| 논문게재일 |
|
|
| 초록(국문) |
Abstract: A Minimalist feature system and the English NEG feature
Since the advent of the Minimalist Program (Chomsky 1993, 1995), many approaches to the Lexicon and Lexical
items (LI) have undergone some theoretical shifts. Among those changes, the feature system is the one that has
become rather drastically different from, let say, that of LGB/PP (Chomsky 1981) framework. On the basis of what
Heidi & Ritter (2002), Adger (2003, 2006, 2007, 2010), Adger & Svenonius (hereafter A&S, 2011) among many
others, have proposed with respect to the Minimalist feature systems, I have analyzed some empirical data in
English. In so doing, I show that the kind of data that I have discussed in the current paper would render further
empirical support for Adger, A&S, as well as for the Strict Lexicalist Hypothesis (Chomsky 1993, 1995) which in
turn brings in a microscopic perspective on Lexicon of the Minimalist syntax. Therefore, NEG, along with its
inherent lexicosemantic content of negation, is not only a functional head (hence it has a First-order feature) but
also it has a Second-order feature since it may trigger a number of syntactic operations such as Subject-Auxiliary
Inversion (SAI), the choice of Tag in sentences with words like seldom , scarcely , the choice of Tag in so called
Transferred Negation (hereafter TN, Quirk, et al 1972, 1985), and Negative Raising (hereafter NR, McCawley
1988) constructions. I, furthermore, have argued, following A&S, that semantics is not sufficient enough to account
for syntactic phenomena, and this paper provides additional empirical explanations and support for the Minimalist
feature system from a series of seemingly unrelated set of phenomena regarding NEG in English. |
|
| 초록(영문) |
|
|
첨부
파일 |
 |
 |
홍성심.pdf |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
