Ȩ : »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê : ¹®ÀǸÞÀÏ : ÀüÀÚÀú³Î
      ¿¬±¸À±¸®À§¿øȸ ±ÔÁ¤
      ÆíÁýÀ§¿øȸ ±ÔÁ¤
      ³í¹®Åõ°í¾È³»/±ÔÁ¤
      ³í¹®ÀÛ¼º¾ç½Ä
      ³í¹®Åõ°í½Åû
      ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç
      ÇÐȸÁö°ü·Ã FAQ
 
 
 
Ȩ > ÇÐȸÁö > ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç
 
Á¦¸ñ Çѱ¹ÀÎ Áß±¹¾î ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ÇÑÀÚ ÀÎÁö±âÁ¦ ¿¬±¸
ÀúÀÚ ±èÇØ·É, ¾ç¸ñÇÑ & °íºñ
±Ç / È£ 26±Ç / 3È£
Ãâó 159-178
³í¹®°ÔÀçÀÏ 2018. 9. 30.
ÃÊ·Ï Kim, Haeryeong; Liang, Muhan & Gao, Fei. (2018). Research on the cognitive processing mechanism of Korean Chinese learners Chinese character. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(3), 159-178. This study mainly explores how different native writing systems impact the L2 learners learning mechanism of Chinese characters and their methods in order to identify the relations between the orthography and pronunciation of characters. For this study, we collected data from thirty L2 Chinese learners consisting of ten elementary and ten intermediate Korean students, and ten intermediate European students. Questionnaire data was analyzed with SPSS 19.0. After analyzing the data, we identified the difficulties South Korean learners with different language proficiencies faced in learning Chinese characters, and also how their orthographies influenced their pronunciation (both the Pinyin and tones) and how these patterns differed from those of their Western peers. The findings are as follows: for the accuracy of Pinyin and tones, the main effect of character typology was significant, for both the Western learners and their South Korean peers, their learning mechanism is influenced by character typology; there is significant difference between groups based on different native writing systems, suggesting native writing systems have no influence on learners learning mechanism. These findings have practical implications for the Chinese classroom.
÷ºÎ
  8.±èÇØ·É ¿Ü.pdf
  8.±èÇØ·É ¿Ü.hwp
 
 
 
 °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£Á¤Ã¥ : À̸ÞÀϹ«´Ü¼öÁý°ÅºÎ : »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê : À̸ÞÀϹ®ÀÇÇϱâ