: 사이트맵 : 문의메일 : JAMS
      연구윤리위원회 규정
      편집위원회 규정
      논문투고안내/규정
      논문작성양식
      논문투고신청
      논문자료실
      학회지관련 FAQ
 
 
 
홈 > 학회지 > 논문자료실
 
제목 영어 보충어와 부가어의 통사⋅의미적 차이점에 대한 연구
저자 이종근 & Jocelyn Wright
권 / 호 25권 / 4호
출처
논문게재일 2017. 12. 31.
초록(국문)

Lee, Jong Kun & Wright, Jocelyn. (2017). Syntactic and semantic differences between complements and adjuncts in English. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(4). 143-166. The distinction between complements and adjuncts plays an important role in syntax and semantics. The purpose of this study is to investigate syntactic and semantic differences between the two in English. Previous studies make use of a group of syntactic tests including the do so test and iterability test and adopt a set of semantic criteria to distinguish complements from adjuncts. Most researchers (Dowty 2000, Aarts 2013, among others) assume that dependents of a predicate can be exhaustively divided into complements and adjuncts. Expanding Grimshaws (1990) idea, DeArmond & Hedberg (1998, 2009), however, argue that some dependents of predicates are neither complements nor adjuncts. They refer to these as secondary complements. DeArmond & Hedberg (1998, 2009) claim that prepositional phrases (PPs) denoting a location are adjuncts, and PPs denoting a goal or source are primary complements. This study, however, argues that some location-denoting PPs are neither pure complements nor pure adjuncts, but a mixed category (adjunct-complements) sharing the properties of both. Moreover, it shows that a set of syntactic tests and semantic criteria indicate that verbs such as live, stand, and reside require location-denoting PPs as adjunct-complements, and verbs such as appear, step, march, and land take goal-denoting or source-denoting PPs as adjunct-complements.











초록(영문)

Lee, Jong Kun & Wright, Jocelyn. (2017). Syntactic and semantic differences between complements and adjuncts in English. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(4). 143-166. The distinction between complements and adjuncts plays an important role in syntax and semantics. The purpose of this study is to investigate syntactic and semantic differences between the two in English. Previous studies make use of a group of syntactic tests including the do so test and iterability test and adopt a set of semantic criteria to distinguish complements from adjuncts. Most researchers (Dowty 2000, Aarts 2013, among others) assume that dependents of a predicate can be exhaustively divided into complements and adjuncts. Expanding Grimshaws (1990) idea, DeArmond & Hedberg (1998, 2009), however, argue that some dependents of predicates are neither complements nor adjuncts. They refer to these as secondary complements. DeArmond & Hedberg (1998, 2009) claim that prepositional phrases (PPs) denoting a location are adjuncts, and PPs denoting a goal or source are primary complements. This study, however, argues that some location-denoting PPs are neither pure complements nor pure adjuncts, but a mixed category (adjunct-complements) sharing the properties of both. Moreover, it shows that a set of syntactic tests and semantic criteria indicate that verbs such as live, stand, and reside require location-denoting PPs as adjunct-complements, and verbs such as appear, step, march, and land take goal-denoting or source-denoting PPs as adjunct-complements.

첨부
  8.이종근 외.pdf
  8.이종근 외.hwp
 
 
 
 개인정보보호정책 : 이메일무단수집거부 : 사이트맵 : 이메일문의하기