|
|
|
|
Ȩ > ÇÐȸÁö > ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç |
|
|
|
|
Á¦¸ñ |
DP/PP asymmetry in English infinitival relative clauses |
ÀúÀÚ |
±è¾ç¼ø |
±Ç / È£ |
25±Ç / 2È£ |
Ãâó |
61-84 |
³í¹®°ÔÀçÀÏ |
2017.6.30. |
ÃÊ·Ï |
Kim, Yangsoon. (2017). DP/PP asymmetry in English infinitival relative clauses. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(2), 61-84. The purpose of this paper is to present the proper syntactic structures and analyses for finite and infinitival relative clauses and explain why there is a DP/PP asymmetry only in infinitival relative clauses in terms of preposition stranding and pied-piping of a wh-relative phrase and a preposition. In the infinitival relative clauses, the pied-piping of a preposition and a wh-relative pronoun is possible but preposition stranding is not possible. I propose the separate and different analyses for finite and infinitival relative clauses: the determiner complement hypothesis or the CP-adjunction hypothesis for finite relative clauses vs. the PP-adjunction hypothesis for infinitival relative clauses. The contrast in the DP/PP asymmetry relates specifically to the finite/non-finite structural distinction of relative clauses. In the proposed analysis of PP-adjunction to NP(N') with an obligatory head P-raising and a subsequent DP-raising for infinitival relative clauses, the DP/PP asymmetry can be easily and explicitly explained in a minimalist way.
|
÷ºÎ |
|
|
4.±è¾ç¼ø.pdf |
|
|
4.±è¾ç¼ø.hwp |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|