Ȩ : »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê : ¹®ÀǸÞÀÏ : ÀüÀÚÀú³Î
      ¿¬±¸À±¸®À§¿øȸ ±ÔÁ¤
      ÆíÁýÀ§¿øȸ ±ÔÁ¤
      ³í¹®Åõ°í¾È³»/±ÔÁ¤
      ³í¹®ÀÛ¼º¾ç½Ä
      ³í¹®Åõ°í½Åû
      ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç
      ÇÐȸÁö°ü·Ã FAQ
 
 
 
Ȩ > ÇÐȸÁö > ³í¹®ÀÚ·á½Ç
 
Á¦¸ñ ¿µ¾î SMS ¾à¾î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇüÅ·ÐÀû ºÐ¼®
ÀúÀÚ °­¼®±Ù¡¤¾ç¼±±â
±Ç / È£ 23±Ç / 2È£
Ãâó 37-51
³í¹®°ÔÀçÀÏ 2015.06.30.
ÃÊ·Ï Kang, Seok-keun & Yang, Seon-ki. (2015). A Morphological Analysis of English SMS abbreviations. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 23(2), 37-51. The purpose of this paper is to survey English abbreviations that are currently used in text messaging and online chat, and to provide a morphological account of them. To this end, we collected 1159 data with morphological properties from five online dictionaries and five websites/blogs, and analyzed them by the processes by which they were formed. The results showed that about 92.49% of all the data were initialisms. Compared with initialism, word-formational processes such as blending, clipping, onomatopoeia etc. were relatively infrequently used to make SMS abbreviations. Clipped words accounted for only 4.06% (47 words) of the collected data, which was followed by onomatopoeia/mimetic words (0.69%), symbols (0.51%) and blends (0.43%). This analysis shows a rather different result from previous analyses (Kumar 2012; Anjaneyulu 2013)
÷ºÎ
  3.°­¼®±Ù ¾ç¼±±â.pdf
 
 
 
 °³ÀÎÁ¤º¸º¸È£Á¤Ã¥ : À̸ÞÀϹ«´Ü¼öÁý°ÅºÎ : »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê : À̸ÞÀϹ®ÀÇÇϱâ