대한언어학회 전자저널

Lee, Jeong-Shik. (2018). Phonetic resurrection from ellipsis sites: A case from pseudo-gapping. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(4), 55-81. Pseudo-gapping remnants have been assumed to raise out of VPs to survive VP-ellipsis via Heavy NP Shift, Object Shift, a combination of the two, or covert QR. I propose that they remain within VPs without raising, and that after VP-ellipsis, they be phonetically resurrected at PF due to their Focus. Thus, ellipsis may leave room for phonology to moderate syntactic overstepping through phonetic resurrection. The current proposal will be supported by showing that the existing approaches do not properly deal with Pseudo-gapping phenomena, and that the current one can offer alternative solutions to the problems that the other ones face.

# Pseudo-gapping # VP-ellipsis # Heavy NP Shift # Object Shift # covert QR # phonetic resurrection

• Abe, J. (2016). Against the “repair by ellipsis” approach: The case of Japanese multiple right dislocation. In Tae Sik Kim & Seungwan Ha (Eds.), Proceedings of the 18th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar. Beyond core syntax: A minimalist approach (pp. 3-16). Sogang University, Seoul.
• Ahn, H.-D. & Cho, S. (2009). On the absence of CP ellipsis in English and Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics, 34, 267-281.
• An, D.-H. (2016). Extra deletion in fragment answers and its implications. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 25, 313-350.
• Baltin, M. (2000). Implications of pseudo-gapping for binding and the representation of information structure. Unpublished manuscript. New York University, New York.
• Baltin, M. (2003). The interaction of ellipsis and binding: Implications for the sequencing of Principle A. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 21, 215-246.
• Bruening, B. (2010). Double object constructions disguised as prepositional datives. Linguistic Inquiry, 41, 287-305.
• Choi, K.-Y. (2003). Head movement in Korean finite clauses. Studies in Generative Grammar, 13, 119-142.
• Fox, D. (2000). Economy and semantic interpretation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
• Goldberg, L. (2005). Verb-stranding VP-ellipsis: A cross-linguistic study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
• Grano, T., & Lasnik, H. (2018). How to neutralize a finite clause boundary: Phase theory and the grammar of bound pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry, 49(3), 465-499.
• Holmberg, A. (1999). Remarks on Holmberg's generalization. Studia Linguistica, 53, 1-39.
• Huang, C.-T. J. (1991). Remarks on the status of the null object. In R. Freidin (Ed.), Principles and parameters in comparative grammar (pp. 56-76). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Ihm, I.-H. (2016). The derivational aspects of Korean non-contrastive heavy adnominal fragments: Two strategies. Studies in Generative Grammar, 26, 15-44.
• Ihm, I.-H. (2017). Remarks on the phenomena of V-PP complex in English Pseudogapping. Studies in Modern Grammar, 94, 17-40.
• Jayaseelan, K. A. (1990). Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis, 20, 64-81.
• Kim, S. (1999). Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP-ellipsis. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 8, 255-284.
• Kratzer, A. (1991). The representation of focus. In A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (Eds.), Semantik/Semantics: An international handbook of contemporary research (pp. 804-825). Berlin: de Gruyter.
• Lasnik, H. (1995). A note on pseudogapping. In R. Pensalfini & H. Ura (Eds.), Papers on minimalist syntax, MITWPL, 27 (pp. 143-164). Cambridge: MIT Working Papers in Linguistics.
• Lasnik, H. (1999). Pseudogapping puzzles. In S. Lappin & E. Benmamoun (Eds.), Fragments: Studies in ellipsis and gapping (pp. 141-174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Lee, J.-S. (2002). Remnants in ellipsis constructions. Studies in Generative Grammar, 12, 169-225.
• Lee, J.-S. (2017a). Two types of VP-ellipsis in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25, 85-120.
• Lee, J.-S. (2017b). A resumption strategy for gapless multiple right dislocation. Language Research, 53(1), 23-58.
• Levin, N. (1978). Some identity-of-sense deletions puzzle me. Do they you? In Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 229-240.
• Merchant, J. (2001). The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands, and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Merchant, J. (2008). Variable island repair under ellipsis. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Topics in ellipsis (pp. 132-153). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Moon, G.-S. (2015). A non-isomorphism approach to null-argument anaphora in Korean. Studies in Generative Grammar, 25, 217-236.
• Otani, K. & J. Whitman. (1991). V-raising and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry, 22, 345-358.
• Park, M.-K. (1994). A morpho-syntactic study of Korean verbal inflection. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
• Rooth, M. (1985). Association with focus. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
• Sauerland, U. (1998). The meaning of chains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge: MA.
• Selkirk, E. (1995). Sentence prosody: Intonation, stress, and phrasing. In J. Goldsmith (Ed.), The handbook of phonological theory, Chapter 6 (pp. 55-569). London: Blackwell.
• Takahashi, S. (2004). Pseudogapping and cyclic linearization. In K. Moulton & M. Wolf (Eds.), Proceedings of the 34th North Eastern Linguistic Society (pp. 571-585). Amherst, MA: GLSA Publications.
• Tanaka, H. (2017). Pseudo-gapping: Evidence for overt quantifier raising. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 23, 271-280.
• Thoms, G. (2016). Pseudogapping, parallelism, and the scope of focus. Syntax, 19(3), 286-307.
• Tomioka, S. (2008). A step-by-step guide to ellipsis resolution. In K. Johnson (Ed.), Topics in ellipsis (pp. 210-228). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.