´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

26±Ç 3È£ (2018³â 9¿ù)

Implicit Statistical Learning Ability in L1 Sentence Processing

On-Soon Lee

Pages : 51-70

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2018.26.3.51

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Lee, On-Soon. (2018). Implicit statistical learning ability in L1 sentence processing. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(3), 51-70. This paper aims to examine the role of implicit statistical learning ability, as measured by artificial grammar learning, in L1-English speakers sentence processing. A total of 44 L1-English adult participants completed two artificial grammar learning tasks and two self-paced English reading tasks. One artificial grammar learning task involved a nonadjacent dependency rule and the other an adjacent dependency rule. One self-paced English reading task contained object relative clauses (a nonadjacent dependency pattern), and the other, number agreement constructions (an adjacent dependency pattern). The results show a significant correlation between the statistical learning of an adjacent dependency rule and the ability to process English number agreement, but not between the statistical learning of a nonadjacent dependency rule and the processing of English object relative clauses. The paper discusses the implications of the partial correlation, and suggests that variations in implicit statistical learning ability may explain why some learners outperform others in the performance of sentence processing.

Keywords

# artificial grammar learning # (implicit) statistical learning # sentence processing # relative clauses # English number agreement

References

  • Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. (2012). Statistical learning: From acquiring specific items to forming general rules. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21(3), 170-176.
  • Brooks, P. J., Kempe, V., & Sionov, A. (2006). The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology. Applied Psycholinguistics, 27, 185-209.
  • Evans, J. L., Saffran, J. R., & Robe-Torres, K. (2009). Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 52(2), 321-335.
  • Farmer, T. A., Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Individual differences in sentence processing. In M. Spivey, M. Joannisse, & K. McRae (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 353-364). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Fiser, J., & Aslin, R. N. (2002). Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 28, 458-467.
  • Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., & Pfeifer, E. (2002). Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 99, 529-534.
  • Gebauer, G. F., & Mackintosh, N. J. (2007). Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit explicit learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33, 34-54.
  • Gibson, E. (1998). Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependences. Cognition, 68, 1-76.
  • Gibson, E. (2000). The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Y. Miyashita, A. P. Marantz, & W. O¡¯Neil (Eds.), Image, Language, Brain (pp. 95-126). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Gómez, R. L. (2002). Variability and detection of variant structure. Psychological Science, 13, 431-436.
  • Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (1999). Artificial grammar learning by one-year-olds leads to specific and abstract knowledge. Cognition, 70, 109-135.
  • Gómez, R. L., & Gerken, L. A. (2000). Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 178-186.
  • Gómez, R.L., & Maye, J. (2005). The developmental trajectory of nonadjacent dependency learning. Infancy, 7, 183-206.
  • Just, M. A., Carpenter, P. A., & Woolley, J. D. (1982). Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111, 228-238.
  • Misyak, J. B., & Christiansen, M. H. (2012). Statistical learning and language: An individual differences study. Language Learning, 62, 302-331.
  • Misyak, J. B., Christiansen, M. H., & Tomblin, B. (2010). On-line individual differences in statistical learning predict language processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 1:31, 1-11.
  • Newport, E. L., & Aslin, R. N. (2004). Learning at a distance I: Statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 127-162.
  • O¡¯Grady, W. (1997). Syntactic development. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Onnis, L., Chun, W. E., & Lou-Magnuson, M. (2018). Improved statistical learning abilities in adult bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 427-433.
  • Romberg, A. R., & Saffran, J. R. (2010). Statistical learning and language acquisition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 906-914.
  • Saffran, J. R. (2001). The use of predictive dependencies in language learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 493-515.
  • Saffran, J. R. (2003). Statistical language learning: Mechanism and constraints. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 110-114.
  • Saffran, J. R., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1996). Statistical learning by 8-month-old infants. Science, 274, 1926-1928.
  • Saffran, J. R., Johnson, E. K., Aslin, R. N., & Newport, E. L. (1999). Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition, 70, 27-52.
  • Santelmann, L. M., & Jusczyk, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity to discontinuous dependencies in language learners: Evidence for limitations in processing space. Cognition, 69, 105-134.
  • Takahashi, E., & Lidz, J. (2008). Beyond statistical learning in syntax. In A. Gavarró & M. J. Freitas (Eds.), Language acquisition and development: Proceedings of Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition (pp. 446-456). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
  • Thompson, S. P., & Newport, E. L. (2007). Statistical learning of syntax: The role of transitional probability. Language Learning and Development, 3(1), 1-42.
  • Waters, G. S., & Caplan, D. (1996). The measurement of verbal working memory capacity and its relation to reading comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 51-79.
  • Yim, D., & Windsor, J. (2010). The roles of nonlinguistic statistical learning and memory in language skills. Korean Journal of Communication Disorder, 15(3), 381-396.
  • Yim, D., & Rudoy, J. (2013). Implicit statistical learning and language skills in bilingual children. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 56(1), 310-322.