´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

26±Ç 2È£ (2018³â 6¿ù)

Oral versus Written English Grammar: Evidence from Korean Adult Learners¡¯ Data

In Lee

Pages : 133-146

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2018.26.2.133

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Lee, In. (2018). Oral versus written English grammar: Evidence from Korean adult learners' data. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(2), 133-146. The purpose of this study is to find out how Korean adult learners of English elicit their answers to the questions which require the use of an English ditransitive verb. Twenty-five students at Jeonju National University of Education in Korea provided the data for this study in 2016. They were juniors majoring in Primary English Education. Over the course of this study, the language informants were asked a number of questions about three different scenes adopted from a wordless picture book, A Circle of Friends, by Giora Carmi (2003). Their oral responses to these questions were collected twice: once in the first week of Semester 1 and again in the first week of Semester 2. Their written responses were collected one month after the second oral test was administered. Their responses were evaluated in terms of two criteria: (i) How sensitive to Focus is each response? (ii) How sensitive to 'Tense' is the response? The following are the findings. First, the language informants oral responses were more sensitive to Focus in Test 2 than in Test 1 except for the responses to Q3c, What is the old man doing with a seed? Second, the language informants were more sensitive to Tense than to Focus in each test. Third, Korean adult learners responded more appropriately when the theme was the current topic of attention.

Keywords

# English ditransitive verb # sensitivity to Focus # sensitivity to Tense

References

  • Aoun, J., & Li, Y. A. (1989). Scope and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry, 20(2), 141-172.
  • Baker, C. L. (1979). Syntactic theory and the projection problem. Linguistic Inquiry, 10(4), 533-581.
  • Bencini, G. M. L., & Goldberg, A. E. (2000). The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning. Journal of Memory & Language, 43, 640-651.
  • Carmi, G. (2003). A circle of friends. New York: Star Bright Books, Inc.
  • Erteschik-Shir, N. (1979). Discourse constraints on dative movement. In T. Givon (Ed.), Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax (pp. 441-167). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Gropen, J., Pinker, S., Hollander, M., Goldberg, R., & Wilson, R. (1989). The learnability and acquisition of the dative alternation in English. Language, 65(2), 203-257.
  • Hong, H.-T. (2003). The English ditransitive construction. The Jungang Journal of English Language & Literature, 45(4), 201-216.
  • Jun, J. S. (2006). Lexical derivation of triadic dative verbs in English. Discourse and Cognition, 13(3), 189-207.
  • Larson, R. K. (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry, 19(3), 335-391.
  • Lee, I. (2017). How sensitive are Korean adult learners of English to 'Focus' and ¡®Tense'? In Proceedings of the SMOG․LAK․KGGC 2017 Joint Conference, 104-108.
  • Lee, I. (2018). Oral vs. written English grammar: Evidence from Korean adult learners' data. In Proceedings of the 2018 KAPEE International Conference, 103-107.
  • Lee, J.-M. (2009). Yeongeo ¡®give' dongsaeui tadongseong (¡¯Transitivity of ¡®give' in English¡¯). New Korean Journal of English Language & Literature, 51(1), 303-323.
  • Lee, J.-H., & Kim, H. M. (2011). The L2 developmental sequence of English constructions and underlying factors. Korean Journal of English Language & Linguistics, 11(3), 577-600.
  • Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Shan, R., & Hong, S. (2009). On ditransitive constructions: A neo-transformational approach. The Journal of Studies in Language, 25(3), 575-599.
  • Shin, G.-H. (2010). On the contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning for Korean learners of English. English Teaching, 65(4), 209-227.
  • Tak, K. (1999). ijung mokjeogeo gumungwa chojeom ('Ditransitive Construction and Focus'). Yeongeoyeongmunhak (English Language & Literature), 18(2), 183-198.
  • Year, J., & Gordon, P. (2009). Korean speakers¡¯ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction: The role of verb prototype, input, distribution, and frequency. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 399-417.
  • Korea TOEIC Committee. (2016, April). 2015nyeon TOEIC TOEIC Speaking pyeonggyun seongjeokeun? (¡®Average scores of TOEIC, TOEIC Speaking in 2015). TOEIC Newsletter, 93. Retrieved May 1, 2018, from http://exam.ybmnet.co.kr/newsletter/index.asp?nid=2&pageno=2.