대한언어학회 전자저널

Kim, Nayu & Lee, Heechul. (2018). A study of learning strategies in a flipped class based on logistic regression analysis. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(2), 87-106. The purpose of this study is to analyze the characteristics of learning strategies of students participating in a flipped English class and to investigate ways to utilize them effectively. To investigate this, questionnaires from 80 students who participated in the flipped class and 80 students in a control group were analyzed. Based on the collected data, an exploratory factor analysis was conducted and four characteristic learning strategies (inducement, reaction, diffusion and application) were extracted. In addition, a logistic regression analysis was carried out, assigning the four strategies to independent variables and class type to a dependent variable. The logistic regression analysis showed that the four learning strategies extracted classified the students accurately around 65% of the time. In particular, diffusion and application strategies were found to be meaningful learning strategies for the students who participated in the flipped class. These results suggest that in order to increase the effectiveness of flipped classes, it is important for the teacher to develop materials that students can actively respond to and share, to provide ample feedback, and to give students creative assignments and projects.

# flipped class # English learning strategies # logistic regression analysis

• Bell, R. M. (2015). An investigation of the impact of a flipped classroom instructional approach on high school students’ content knowledge and attitudes toward the learning environment. Unpublished master’s thesis, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah.
• Bergman, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Washington D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.
• Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. The Chronical of Higher Education, 58(25), 16-18.
• Bishop, J. L., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The flipped classroom: A survey of the research. In Proceedings of the ASEE National Conference (pp. 33-34). Atlanta, GA.
• Cockrum, T. (2014). Flipping your English class: To reach all learners. New York: Routledge.
• Correa, M. (2015). Flipping the foreign language classroom and critical pedagogies: A (new) old trend. Higher Education for the Future, 2(2), 111-125.
• Davies, R. S., Dean, D. L., & Ball, N. (2013). Flipping the classroom and instructional technology integration in a college-level information systems spreadsheet course. Educational Technology Research & Development, 61, 563-583.
• Elliott, R. (2014). Analysis of student perceptions and behaviors in a flipped classroom undergraduate information technology course. The 121st ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Indianapolis, USA.
• Enfield, J. (2013). Flipped excel. Information Systems Education Journal, 11(1), 63-73.
• Fulton, K. P. (2012). 10 reasons to flip. New Style of Instruction, 94(2), 20-24.
• Han, Y. J. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for learner autonomy. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1), 98-193.
• Johnson, L. W., & Renner, J. (2012). Effect of the flipped classroom model on a secondary computer applications course: Student and teacher perceptions, questions and student achievement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville, Kentucky.
• Joseph, H., Rolph, A., & Bill, B. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kim, M.-K., & Shin, C.-W. (2016). The effect of flipped classroom on middle school learners’ English academic achievement and affective domains. Secondary Education Research, 64(2) 289-314.
• Lee, H.-O., & Min, C.-K. (2016). A study of secondary English teachers’ perceptions of the flipped classroom. Secondary English Education, 9(3), 99-122.
• Lee, S.-E. (2016). Effects of flipped learning on failure tolerance and English study attitude of English studying collegians. English 21, 29(4). 253-276.
• Leis, A., Tohei. A., & Cooke, S. (2015). The effects of flipped classrooms on English composition writing in an EFL environment. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 5(4), 37-51.
• Musib, M. K. (2014). Student perceptions of the impact of using the flipped classroom approach for an introductory-level mulitdisciplinary module. CDTL Brief, 12(2), 15-20.
• O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York City, NY: Cambridge University Press.
• Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning strategies by university students. Modern Language Journal, 73, 291-300.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York City, NY: Heinle and Heinle Publishers, Inc.
• Rye, D. H. (2014). The effectiveness of output-first activities involving speaking and writing adapted for EFL. STEM Journal, 15(10), 155-174.
• Schmitt, N., & Schmitt, D. (1995). Identifying and assessing vocabulary learning strategies. Papers from the Thai Tesol Bulletin, 5, 27-33.
• Spino, A., & Trego, D. (2015). Strategies for fliping communicative language classes. East Lansing, Michigan: Michigan State University Press.
• Strayer, J. F. (2007). The effect of the classroom flip on the learning environment: A comparison of learning activity in a traditional classroom and a flip classroom that uses an intelligent tutoring system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio State University.
• Sung, K.-W. (2014). A case study on a flipped classroom in an EFL content course. Multimedia-Assisted Language Learning, 18(2), 159-187.
• Wang, X. D., & Zhang, C. J. Z. (2013). The application research of flipped classroom in university teaching ― A case study on professional English of educational technology. Modern Educational Technology, 8, 11-16.
• Webb, M., Dman, E., & Pusey, K. (2014). Flipping a Chinese university EFL course: What students and teachers think of the model. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 11(4), 53-87.