´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î
-
English Stop Production before a Nasal in Korean L2 Learners
-
The Benefits of Formative Feedback for Critical Writing in EFL Context
-
A Corpus-based Study of the Use of English Articles by Korean EFL Learners
-
½ÃÆ®ÄÞÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ Á¤ÇüÈµÈ ¹è¿(Formulaic Sequences)ÀÇ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇнÀ ¹æ¾È
-
±³»ç À¯Çü¿¡ µû¸¥ ¿µ¾îÇнÀ ¼ºÃëµµ, ±³»ç-À¯¾Æ °£ »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ ºÐ¼®
-
Áß±¹ÀÎ Çѱ¹¾î ÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ÀÚÀ¯ ¹ßÈ¿¡ ³ªÅ¸³ ÀÚÀ½ ´ëÄ¡ ¿À·ù ¿¬±¸ —Ãʼº°ú Á¾¼º ȯ°æÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î
-
Çѱ¹ ´ëÇлýµéÀÌ ¿µ¾îÀбâ¼ö¾÷¿¡¼ »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀü·«°ú ÀÚ±âÈ¿´É°¨¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸
26±Ç 1È£ (2018³â 3¿ù)
- ½ÃÆ®ÄÞÀ» È°¿ëÇÑ Á¤ÇüÈµÈ ¹è¿(Formulaic Sequences)ÀÇ È¿°úÀûÀÎ ÇнÀ ¹æ¾È
-
±èÇýÁ¤
Pages : 119-143
Abstract
Keywords
# Á¤ÇüÈµÈ ¹è¿(formulaic sequences) # ¹®¸Æ(context) # »óȲ(situation) # ÁٰŸ®(story) # ¿µ»ó ¸Åü(visual media) # ½ÃÆ®ÄÞ(sitcom)
References
- ±èÇýÁ¤. (2016). ¿µÈ¸¦ È°¿ëÇÑ ¸í½ÃÀû ¿µ¾î °ÅÀý ÈÇà ÇнÀ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸. ¾ð¾îÇÐ, 24(1), 71-94.
- ±èÇýÁ¤. (2017). Á¦ 2¾ð¾î, ¹®È ¹× À±¸® ±³À° ÀÚ·á·Î¼ÀÇ ¿µÈ À½¾Ç È°¿ë: ¶óÀÌ¿Â Å· OST¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. Çѱ¹ÄÜÅÙÃ÷ÇÐȸ³í¹®Áö, 17(5), 509-519.
- À¯µµÇü. (2015). ¿µÈ ´ãÈÀÇ È¿ëÀû Ư¼ºÀÌ ±â¾ï·Â¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ. ¾ð¾îÇÐ, 23(1), 161-181.
- ÀÌÁöÇö, ÀÌÀÚ¿ø. (2014). ¹Ìµå¸¦ ÅëÇØ º» ¾îÈÖÁ¢±Ù¹ýÀÇ Çã¿Í ½Ç. ¿µ»ó¿µ¾î±³À°, 15(1), 175-195.
- Alali, F. A., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Teaching formulaic sequences: The same as or different from teaching single words? TESOL Journal, 3(2), 153-180.
- Bishop, H. (2004). Noticing formulaic sequences: A problem of measuring the subjective. LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 15-19. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison.
- Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Vellenga, H. E. (2012). The effect of instruction on conventional expressions in L2 pragmatics. System, 40, 77-89.
- De Bot, K., Paribakht, S. T., & Wesche, B. M. (1997). Towards a lexical processing model for the study of second language vocabulary acquisition. SSLA, 19(3), 309-329.
- Ellis, G., & Brewster, J. (1990). The storytelling handbook for primary teacher. London: Penguin.
- Ellis, R. (1993). The structural syllabus and second language acquisition. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 91-113.
- Ellis, R. (2002). Methodological options in grammar teaching materials. In E. Hinkel & S. Fotos (Eds.), New perspective on grammar teaching in second language classroom (pp. 155-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbarm Associates.
- Erman, B., & Warren, B. (2000). The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text, 20(1), 29-62.
- Herron, C., York, H., Corrie, C., & Cole, P. S. (2006). A comparison study of the effects of a story-based video instructional package versus a text-based instructional package in the intermediate-level foreign language classroom. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 281-307.
- House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language: Routines and metapragmatic awareness. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(2), 225-252.
- Hsu, T. J. (2007). Lexical collocations and their relation to the online writing of Taiwanese college English majors and non-English majors. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 4(2), 192-209.
- Hsu, T. J., & Chiu, C. (2008). Lexical collocations and their relation to speaking proficiency. The Asian EFL Journal, 10(1), 181-204.
- Jones, M., & Haywood, S. (2004). Facilitating the acquisition of formulaic sequences: An exploratory study in an EAP context. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences: Acquisition, processing and use (pp. 269-300). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: John Benjamins.
- Keshavarz, M. H., & Salimi, H. (2007). Collocational competence and cloze test performance: A study of Iranian EFL learners. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 81-92.
- Khodadady, E., & Shamsaee, S. (2012). Formulaic sequences and their relationship with speaking and listening abilities. English Language Teaching, 5(2), 39-49.
- Kim, B. G. (2011). A study of teaching communicative grammar through multi-media technology. STEM Journal, 12(2), 143-165.
- Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners¡¯ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647-672.
- Lewis, M. (2009). The idiom principle in L2 English: Assessing elusive formulaic sequences as indicators of idiomaticity, fluency, and proficiency. Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag Dr. Mὔller.
- Martínez, I. B. (2007). A story-based approach to teaching English. Encuentro, 17, 52-56.
- Meunier, F., & Granger, S. (Eds.). (2008). Phraseology in foreign language learning and teaching. Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
- Nemeth, N., & Kormos, J. (2001). Pragmatic aspects of task performance: The case of argumentation. Language Teaching Research, 5(3), 213-240.
- Oller, J. Jr. (1983). Some working ideas for language teaching. In J. Oller, Jr & P. R. Amato (Eds.), Methods that work (pp. 3-19). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
- Schmitt, N. (2010). Researching vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Schmitt, N., & Carter, R. (2004). Formulaic sequences in action: An introduction. In N. Schmitt (Ed.), Formulaic sequences (pp. 1-22). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: John Benjamins.
- Takimoto, M. (2006). The effects of explicit feedback on the development of pragmatic proficiency. Language Teaching Research, 10(4), 393-417.
- Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463-489.
- Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
- Wray, A. (2008). Formulaic language: Pushing the boundaries. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.