대한언어학회 전자저널

Kim, So-Jee & Cho, Sae-Youn. (2018). Positive stripping construction in English: A direct interpretation approach. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(1), 75-96. The so-called positive Stripping construction in English involves the conjunction and, a single constituent XP, and the adverb too. This construction seems to be an incomplete sentence and nonetheless, delivers a complete sentential meaning. To generate such sentences and provide propositional meanings, we propose a construction-based analysis in a direct interpretation approach, rejecting the previous analyses mainly based on deletion approaches. In so doing, we suggest a positive stripping construction rule, which enables us to provide an explanation on the syntactic structure and the meaning of the construction at issue.

# 최소 공백화 구문(Stripping Construction) # 구문문법(Construction Grammar) # 접속사(conjunction) and # 부사(adverb) too # 직접 해석 접근법(Direct Interpretation Approach) # 삭제(deletion)

• 김소지. (2018). 영어 Stripping 구문에 관한 연구: 구문문법 기반으로. 강원대학교 박사학위 논문.
• 조세연, 이한규. (2017). “왜-XP?” 구문의 특성: 직접 해석 접근법을 중심으로. 인문과학연구, 55, 97-120.
• Boas, H. C., & Sag, I. A. (Eds.). (2012). Sign-Based Construction Grammar. CSLI Publications/Center for the Study of Language and Information.
• Chomsky, N. (1971). Deep structure, surface structure, and semantic interpretation. In D. D. Steinberg & L. A. Jakobovits (Eds.), Semantics: an interdisciplinary reader in philosophy, linguistics and psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Depiante, M. A. (2000). The syntax of deep and surface anaphora: A study of null complement anaphora and stripping/bare argument ellipsis. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Connecticut.
• Ginzburg, J. (2012). The interactive stance: Meaning for conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ginzburg, J., & Sag, I. A. (2000). Interrogative investigations: The form, meaning, and use of English interrogatives. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
• Hankamer, J., & Sag, I. A. (1976). Deep and surface anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry, 7, 391-428.
• Heim, I., & Kratzer, A. (1998). Semantics in generative grammar. Malden, MA.: Blackwell Publishers.
• Kaplan, J. (1984). Obligatory too in English. Language, 60, 510-518.
• Kim, J.-B. (2017). Why-Stripping in English and Korean: A direct interpretation approach. Studies in Generative Grammar, 27(4), 733-751.
• Kim, S.-J., & Cho, S.-Y. (2016). VP-ellipsis, stripping, and the functions of the delimiter-to in Korean. Language and Information, 20(1), 93-110.
• Lobeck, A. (1995). Ellipsis: Functional heads, licensing, and identification. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Merchant, J. (2003). Remarks on stripping: Section excised from submitted version of fragments and ellipsis. Unpublished manuscript, University of Chicago.
• Ross, J. R. (1969). Guess who? In R. I. Binnick, A. Davison, G. M. Green, & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, 252-286.
• Wurmbrand, S. (2016). Stripping and topless complements. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
• Yoshida, M., Nakao, C., & Ortega-Santos, I. (2015). The syntax of Why-stripping. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 33(1), 323-370.