대한언어학회 전자저널

Kim, Eunjeo. (2018). The benefits of formative feedback for critical writing in EFL context. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 26(1), 23-55. Although formative feedback has been shown to be beneficial in L1 writing classes, the benefits of formative feedback for critical writing in EFL context have not been widely explored. The aim of this study is to determine which factors are more effective in improving EFL students critical writing. The study was conducted in an intensive English reading and writing program with 134 university students divided into two intermediate and two beginner level classes. The researcher provided formative feedback over the course of the semester. Analysis of the critical writing achievement test measured from writing collected at the beginning and end of the course revealed that the experimental group (EG), which received formative feedback focused on their critical writing, made more meaningful gains on the writing achievement test than the control group (CG), which had only corrective feedback during class. Results also demonstrated that students at the beginner level in the EG improved more than those at the intermediate levels on the writing achievement test. In addition, learners at the beginner level in the EG made gains in both micro and macro aspects of critical writing, while those at the intermediate level improved only macro aspects of their critical writing. Both the intermediate and beginner groups made similar gains in criticality.

# formative feedback # macro aspects of writing # micro aspects of writing # corrective feedback # critical writing # developmental feedback

• Al-Jarf, R. (2006). Large student enrollments in EFL programs: Challenges and consequences. Asian EFL Journal Quarterly, 8(4), 8-34.
• Anton, M., & DiCamilla, F. (1998). Sociocognitive functions of L1 collaborative interaction in the L2 classroom. Canadian Modern Language Journal, 54, 314-342.
• Bailey, R. (2009). Undergraduate students’ perceptions of the role and utility of written assessment feedback. Journal of Learning Development in Higher Education, 1, 1-14, Retrieved 20 October, 2017 from http://www.aldinhe.ac.uk/ojs/index.php?journal=jldhe&page=index
• Bain, J. D., Mills, C., Ballantyne, R., & Packer, J. (2002). Developing reflection on practice through journal writing: Impacts of variations in the focus and level of feedback. Teachers & Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(2), 171-196. doi:10.1080/13540600220127368
• Balcazar, F. E., Hopkins, B. L., & Suarez, Y. (1985). A critical, objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7(3-4), 65-89.
• Baron, R. A. (1993). Criticism (informal negative feedback) as a source of perceived unfairness in organizations: Effects, mechanisms, and countermeasures. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 155-170). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ataç, B. A. (2015). From descriptive to critical writing: A study on the effectiveness of advanced reading and writing instruction, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 620-626. Retrieved July 20, 2017, from https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042815046078/1-s2.0-S1877042815046078-main.pdf?_tid=807f362c-ffe1-11e7-a368-00000aacb35f&acdnat=1516673145_d9229907617a424f0c8239ebd6f4ac97
• Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 227-258.
• Blatchford, P., Moriarty, V., Edmonds, S., & Martin, C. (2002). Relationships between class size and teaching: A multi-method analysis of English infant school. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 101-132.
• Brown, H. D. (2007). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
• Burns, C., & Foo, M. (2011) International students’ perceptions of their global skills development: a collaborative approach. Emerge, 3, 25-42.
• Canagarajah, A. S. (2002). Critical academic writing and multilingual students. The University of Michigan Press.
• Carless, D. (2006). Differing perceptions in the feedback process. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 219-223
• Chandler, J. (2003). The efficacy of various kinds of error feedback for improvement in the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(3), 267-296.
• Chiharu, N. (2007). The effects of different types of feedback on revision. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 4(4), 213-244.
• Clarke, S. (2003). Enriching feedback in the primary classroom: Oral and written feedback from teachers and children. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
• Corder, S. P. (1981), Error analysis and interlanguage. Oxford University Press.
• Crewe, W. J. (1990). πie illogic of logical connectors. ELT Jounals, 44, 316-325.
• De La Paz, S., & Graham, S. (2002). Explicitly teaching strategies, skills, and knowledge: Writing instruction in middle school classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 687-698. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.687
• Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. London: Routledge.
• Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.
• Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365-387.
• Fedor, D. B., Davis, W. D., Maslyn, J. M., & Mathieson, K. (2001). Performance improvement efforts in response to negative feedback: The roles of source power and recipient self-esteem. Journal of Management, 27(1), 79-97.
• Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11.
• Ferris, D. R. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Ferris, D. R., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, 161-184.
• Freeman, M. H. (2002). Cognitive mapping in literacy analysis. Los Angeles Valley College. EBSCO Publishing.
• Frey, N., & Fisher, D. (2011). The formative assessment action plan: Practical steps to more successful teaching and learning. Alexandria, Virginia: ASCD.
• Granger, S., & Tyson, S. (1996). Connector usage in the English essay writing of native and non-native EFL speakers of English. World Englishes, 15, 17-27.
• Green, A. (2005). EAP study recommendations and score gains on the IELTS Academic Writing test. Assessing Writing, 10(1), 44-60.
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2013). Cohesion in English. Abingdon/New York, NY: Routledge.
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Husan, R. (2001). Cohesion in English. Beijing, China: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
• Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
• Hatton, N., & Smith, D. (1995). Reflection in teacher education: Towards definition and implementation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(1), 33-49.
• Husan, R. (1984). Coherence and cohesive harmony. In J. Flood (Ed.), Understanding reading comprehension (pp. 181-219). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Hyland, K. (2006). English for academic purposes: An advanced resource book. Abingdon: Routledge.
• Krashen, S., Butler, J., Birnbaum, R., & Robertson J. (1978). Two studies in language acquisition and language learning. ITL: Review of Applied Linguistics, 39/40, 73-92.
• Kim, Eun-jeo. (2017a). Enhancing critical language awareness with discourse analysis frameworks in the EFL context. Foreign Studies, 39, 11-42.
• Kim, Eun-jeo. (2017b). Fostering criticality in English presentation class for EFL learners. The Journal of Studies in Language, 33(1), 45-70.
• Kim, H.-K. (2017). Critical thinking and critical pedagogy in English language teaching. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(4). 41-58.
• Irons, A. (2008). Enhancing learning through formative assessment. London: Routledge.
• Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85.
• Laksmi, E. D. (2006). “Scaffolding” students’ writing in EFL class: Implementing process approach. TEFLIN Journal: A publication on the teaching and learning of English, 17(2). 144-156.
• Linquanti, R., Crane, E. W., & Huang, M. (2010). Examining growth in the English language proficiency of California’s English language learners. San Francisco: WestEd.
• Locastro, V. (2001). Teaching English to large classes. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 493-506.
• Merrill, D. M. (1994). Instructional design theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
• Merrill, D. M. (2002). Instructional strategies and learning styles: Which takes precedence? In R. A. Reiser & J. V. Dempsey (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (pp. 99-106). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
• Moon, J. A. (2008). A handbook of reflective practice and experiential learning: Theory and practice. London: Routledge Falmer.
• Murphy, C., & Cornell, J. (2010). Student perceptions of feedback: seeking a coherent flow. Practitioner Research in Higher Education, 4(1), 41-51.
• Nassaji, H., & Swain, M. (2000). A Vygotskian perspective on corrective feedback in L2: The effect of random versus negotiated help on the learning of English articles. Language Awareness, 9, 34-51.
• Nguyen, H. T. T. (2016). Macro and micro skills in second language academic writing: A study of Vietnamese learners of English. Theses. Paper 2008. Retrieved July 21, 2017 from http://opensiuc.lib.siu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3022&context=theses
• Oshima, A., & Hogue, A. (2007). Introduction to academic writing (3rd ed.). White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.
• Paulus, T. M. (1999). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 265-289.
• Perkins, D. (1992). Smart school: Better thinking and learning for every child. New York, NY: The Free Press.
• Poulos, A., & Mahony, M. J. (2008). Effectiveness of feedback: The students’ perspective. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(2), 143-154.
• Rassaei, E., & Moinzadeh, A. (2011). Investigating the effects of three types of corrective feedback on the acquisition of English Wh-question forms by Iranian EFL learners. English Language Teaching, 4(2), 97-106.
• Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27-57.
• Sadler, R. (1989). Formative assessment and the design of instructional systems. Instructional Science, 18, 119-144.
• Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153-189.
• Stapleton, P. (2002). Critical thinking in Japanese L2 writing: rethinking tired constructs. ELT Journal, 56(3), 250-257.
• Storch, N., & Wigglesworth, G. (2010). Learners’ processing, uptake, and retention of corrective feedback on writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(2), 303-334.
• Sturm, J., & Rankin-Erickson, J. (2002). Effects of hand-drawn and computer generated concept mapping on the expository writing of middle school students with learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 17(2), 124-139. Retrieved March 2, 2017 from doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00039, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1540-5826.00039
• Spendlove, D. (2009). Putting assessment for learning into practice. London/New York: Continuum International Pub Group.
• Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
• Van Geert, P., & Steenbeek, H. (2005). A complexity and dynamic systems approach to development: Measurement, modeling and research. In K.W. Fischer, A. Battro, & P. Lena (Eds.), Mind, Brain, and Education (pp. 1-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. London: Longman.
• Yorke, M. (2003). Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice. Journal of Higher Education, 45(4), 471-501.