대한언어학회 전자저널

Ma, Jee Hyun & Cho, Young Ah. (2017). The effects of different types of reading instruction on L2 reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(4). 103-123. This study investigated the effects of different types of reading instruction on L2 reading comprehension and metacognitive awareness of strategies. Sixty-eight students with low-intermediate English proficiency levels were assigned to summarization task, textual enhancement task, and control groups. The present study employed three major instruments: a background questionnaire, a pre- and post-Metacognitive Awareness of Reading Strategies Inventory (MARSI), and pre- and post-reading comprehension tests. The findings of the study indicate that textual enhancement instruction leads to improvement in terms of metacognitive strategy use and reading comprehension performance. In addition, both the summarization and textual enhancement groups show better reading gains compared to their initial reading knowledge. Pedagogical implications and suggestions for L2 reading research have been added based on the findings.

# reading instruction # metacognitive strategies # summarization # textual enhancement

• Aghaie, R., & Zhang, L. J. (2012). Effects of explicit instruction in cognitive and metacognitive reading strategies on Iranian EFL students' reading performance and strategy transfer. Instructional Science, 40(6), 1063-1082.
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460-472.
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133-150.
• Brantmeier, C., Callender, A., Yu, Z., & McDaniel, M. (2012). Textual enhancements and comprehension with adult readers of English in China. Reading in a Foreign Language, 24(2), 158-185.
• Brown, A. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanism. In F. Weinert & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 393-451). Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
• Carrell, P. L. (1989). Metacognitive awareness and second language. The Modern Language Journal, 73(2), 121-134.
• Chiu, C.-H. (2015). Enhancing reading comprehension and summarization abilities of EFL learners through online summarization practice. The Journal of Language Teaching and Learning, 1, 79-95.
• Cohen, A. D. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learners, teachers, and researchers. New York: Newbury House.
• Cordero-Ponce, W. L. (2000). Summarization instruction: Effects on foreign language comprehension and summarization of expository texts. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(4), 329-350.
• Delaney, Y. A. (2008). Investigating the reading-to-write construct. Journal of English for Academic Purpose, 7(3), 140-150.
• Fotovatian, S., & Shokrpour, N. (2007). Comparison of the efficiency of reading comprehension strategies on Iranian university students' comprehension. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 37(2), 47-63.
• Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-69.
• Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow, England: Pearson Education.
• Graham, S., & Herbert, M. A. (2010). Writing to read: Evidence for how writing can improve reading. A Carnegie corporation time to Act Report. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
• Ha, S. M. (2016). It’s English healing reading. Seoul: Bookexam.
• Han, Z., Park, E. S., & Combs, C. (2008). Textual enhancement of input: Issues and possibilities. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 1-22.
• Irwin, J. (2006). Teaching reading comprehension processes (3rd ed). Boston. MA: Allyn & Bacon.
• Karbalaei, A. (2010). A comparison of the metacognitive reading strategies used by EFL and ESL readers. The Reading Matrix, 10(2), 165-180.
• Kwon, J.-H. (2015). The effects of the input enhancement activity on English test-taking performance. Unpublished master’s thesis, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Korea.
• LaBrozzi, R. M. (2016). The effects of textual enhancement type on L2 form recognition and reading comprehension in Spanish. Language Teaching Research, 20(1), 75-91.
• Li, F. (2010). A study of English reading strategies used by senior middle school students. Asian Social Science, 6(10), 184-192.
• Loewen, S., & Inceoglu, S. (2016). The effectiveness of visual input enhancement on the noticing and L2 development of the Spanish past tense. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 89-110.
• Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classroom. London: Continuum International.
• Macaro, E., & Erler, L. (2008). Raising the achievement of young-beginner readers of French through strategy instruction. Applied Linguistics, 29(1), 90-119.
• Missori, L. (2007). Applying critical thinking to reading. Longview Community College. Retrieved June 20, 2010, Retrieved from http://www.ss.Critical thinking.html.
• Mokeddem, S., & Houcine, S. (2016). Exploring the relationship between summary writing ability and reading comprehension: Toward an EFL writing-to-read instruction. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 197-205.
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249-259.
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
• Salataki, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on L1 and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(1), 1-17.
• Sarkhosh, M., Taghipore, B., & Sarkhosh, H. (2013). Differential effect of different textual enhancement formats on intake. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 70, 544-559.
• Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in language teaching. New York, NY: Cambridge University.
• Sharwood Smith, M. (1993). Input enhancement in instructed SLA: Theoretical bases. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(2), 165-179.
• Shen, M. Y. (2009). Reading writing connection for EFL college learners' literacy development. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 68-79.
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, M. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native speakers and non-native speakers. System, 29(4), 431-449.
• Shim, J., Lee, H., & Jin, S. (2016). A study on the correlation between self-efficacy beliefs and strategies in English reading. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(2), 101-125.
• Shokrpour, N., Sadeghi, A., & Seddigh, F. (2013). The effect of summary writing as a critical reading strategy on reading comprehension of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Studies in Education, 3(2), 127-138.
• Simard, D. (2009). Differential effects of textual enhancement formats on intake. System, 37(1), 124-135.
• Zhang, Z. H., & Zhang, L. J. (2011). Developing and validating a listening comprehension problems scale for enhancing Chinese university students' metacognitive awareness of L2 listening. Journal of Asia TEFL, 8, 318-335.
• Zhang, L. J., & Wu, A. (2009). Chinese senior high school EFL students' metacognitive awareness and reading-strategy. Reading in a Foreign Language, 21(1), 37-59.