대한언어학회 전자저널

Song, Kyung-An & Heine, Bernd. (2017). Some Patterns of Grammatical Change in Personal Pronouns. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(1), 139-162. The main goal of the present paper is to reconstruct some of the dynamics underlying the rise and development of personal pronouns in general and of forms for pronominal address in particular. By looking at a number of languages from different parts of the world, we argue that there is a generalized mechanism which accounts for some regularities in this development. The mechanism has some implications for the grammatical structure of the languages concerned. It seems to be responsible for the rise of new grammatical forms and for the loss of other ones, whereby categories and the system of personal deixis are redefined. Another implication is that the processes described in the paper may give rise to polysemous coding, i.e. the forms used for indirect personal reference serve both in their old and new functions simultaneously.

# devaluation # honorific pronoun # indirect address # personal deixis # positioning # spatial deixis # T-form # V-form

• Brown, R., & Gilman, A. (1968). The pronouns of power and solidarity. In J. A. Fishman (Ed.) (1968), Readings in the Sociology of Language (pp. 252-281). The Hague, Paris: Mouton.
• Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bybee, J. L., & Hopper, P. J. (Eds.). (2001). Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. (Typological Studies in Language, 45.) Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
• Corrigan, R., Eckman, F., & Noonan, M. (Eds.) (1989). Linguistic Categorization. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.
• Domonkosi, Á. (2010). Variability in Hungarian address forms. Acta Linguistica Hungarica, 57(1), 29-52.
• Haase, M. (1992). Sprachkontakt und Sprachwandel im Baskenland: die Einflüsse des Gaskognischen und Französischen auf das Baskische. Hamburg: Buske.
• Haase, M. (1994). Respekt: die Grammatikalisierung von Höflichkeit. (Edition Linguistik, 44.) Munich, Newcastle: LINCOM Europa.
• Head, B. (1978). Respect degrees in pronominal reference. In J. H. Greenberg, C. A. Ferguson & E. Moravcsik (Eds.) (1978), Universals of Human Language. Vol. 3: Word structure (pp. 151-211). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Heine, B. (2013). On isomorphism and formulas of equivalence in language contact. In C. Guangshun, H. Chappell, R. Djamouri & T. Wiebusch (eds.) (2013), Breaking down the Barriers: Interdisciplinary Studies in Chinese Linguistics and Beyond (pp. 755-784). Taiwan: Institute of Linguistics, Academia Sinica.
• Heine, B., Claudi, U., & Hünnemeyer, F. (1991). Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Heine, B., & Kuteva, T. (2005). Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Heine, B., & Song, K.-A. (2010). On the genesis of personal pronouns: some conceptual sources. Language and Cognition, 2(1), 117-48.
• Heine, B., & Song, K.-A. (2011). On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns. Journal of Linguistics, 47(3), 587-630.
• Held, G. (1999). Submission strategies as an expression of the ideology of politeness: reflections on the verbalisation of social power relations. Pragmatics, 9, 21-36.
• Helmbrecht, J. (2005). Typologie und Diffusion von Höflichkeitspronomina in Europa. Folia Linguistica, 39(3-4), 417-52.
• Hinds, J. (1986). Japanese. London, New York: Routledge.
• Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Keller, R. (1997). In what sense can explanations of language change be functional? In J. Gvozdanović (Ed.) (1997), Language Change and Functional Explanations (pp. 9-20). (Trends in Linguistics, Studies and Monographs, 98.) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Kim, C.-K. (2009). Personal pronouns in English and Korean texts: A corpus- based study in terms of textual interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 41, 2086-2099.
• Kim, M.-H. (1995). Hangugeo Daemyeongsa [Korean Pronouns]. Hanshin Publisher, Seoul.
• Kitagawa, C. & Lehrer, A. (1990). Impersonal uses of personal pronouns. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(5), 739-59.
• Levinson, S. C. (1979). Pragmatics and social deixis. BLS (Berkeley Linguistics Society), 5, 206-23.
• Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Listen, P. (1999). The Emergence of German Polite ‘Sie’: Cognitive and Sociolinguistic Parameters. (Berkeley Insights in Linguistics and Semiotics, 32.) New York: Peter Lang.
• Matalene, C. (1985). Contrastive rhetoric: An American writing teacher in China. College English, 47, 789-807.
• Martelotta, M. E. T., & Cezario, M. M. (2011). Grammaticalization in Brazilian Portuguese. In H. Narrog & B. Heine (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization (pp. 727-737). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Merlan, A. (2006). Grammatikalisierungstendenzen im Portugiesischen und Rumänischen: von Nominalsyntagmen zu Pronomina. In J. Schmidt-Radefeldt (Ed.), Portugiesisch kontrastiv gesehen und Anglizismen weltweit (pp. 221-240). (Rostocker Romanistische Arbeiten, 10.) Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
• Rhee, S. (1998), Understanding grammaticalization. Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Co.
• Seo, J.-B. (1989). Uri Mal-ui Ppuri [Roots of the Korean Language]. Seoul: Koreaone Publishing Co.
• Shibatani, M. (1990). The Languages of Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Siewierska, A. (2004). Person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Simon, H. J. (1999). On the rise of a grammatical category 'Respect' in German. Paper Presented at the International Conference of Historical Linguistics XIV, Vancouver, 9-13 August, 1999.
• Simon, H. J. (2003). Für eine Grammatische Kategorie ‘Respekt’ im Deutschen: Synchronie, Diachronie und Typologie der deutschen Anredepronomina. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Sökeland, W. (1980). Indirektheit von Sprechhandlungen: eine linguistische Unter- suchung. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
• Song, K.-A. (2002). Korean reflexives and grammaticalization: A speaker-hearer dynamic approach. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF, Berlin), 55(5), 340-353.
• Song, K.-A. (2003). Speaker-hearer dynamics and grammaticalization. Journal of the Society of German Language and Literature (Korea), 22, 53-75.
• Song, K.-A. (2011). Speaker-hearer dynamics and grammaticalization of Japanese pronouns. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 19(1), 61-78.
• Song, K.-A. (2012), Speaker-hearer dynamics and grammaticalization of pronouns in European languages. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 20(2), 61-80.
• Song, K.-A. & B. Heine. (2016). On the role of indirect personal reference in the development of personal pronouns. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(1), 1-20.
• Suzuki, T. (1984). Words in Context. Tokyo: Kodansha International.
• Tanaka, S. (2009). Deixis und Anaphorik: Referenzstrategien im Text, Satz und Wort. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Munich.
• Traugott, E. C., &. Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 96.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Travis, C. E., & Silveira, A. S. (2009). The role of frequency in first-person plural variation in Brazilian Portuguese: Nós vs. a gente. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2(2), 347-376.
• Whitman, J. (1999). Personal pronoun shift in Japanese: A case study in lexical change and point of view. In A. Kamio & K. Takama (Eds.), Function and Structure: In Honor of Susumu Kuno (pp. 357-386). Amsterdam and Philadelphia: Benjamins.
• Yamamoto, M. (2006). Agency and Impersonality: Their Linguistic and Cultural Manifestations. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: Benjamins.