´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

25±Ç 1È£ (2017³â 3¿ù)

Verbal Reflexive as a SELF Anaphor in Ho

Taejin Koh & Dohun Kim

Pages : 55-73

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2017.25.1.55

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Koh, Taejin & Kim, Dohun. (2017). Verbal Reflexive as a SELF Anaphor in Ho. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 25(1), 55-73. Ho is one of the very few languages on the Indian Subcontinent that rely exclusively on the verbal reflective. Its non-overt object is the empty category; and its reflexive morpheme is an argument-absorbing operator that detransitivizes the verb. Moreover, the intransitive marker functions as the verbal and passive markers. Such observations compel this study to assume that the nature of Hos verbal reflexive is fundamentally associated with its non-overt object. In order to gain a deeper understanding of the verbal reflexive, this study sets out to provide an overall description of the properties of Hos verbal reflexive, followed by a thorough examination of its nature within the framework of predicate-centered binding theory put forward by Reinhart (1983) and Reinhart and Reuland (1993).

Keywords

# detransitivitizer # SELF anaphor # predicate-centered reflexivity # verbal reflexive # condition R

References

  • Burrows, L. (1915/1980). The grammar of the Ho language. New Delhi: Cosmo.
  • Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • Cole, P., & Sung, L-M. (1994). Head movement and long distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 355-406.
  • Deeney, J. (1966). An introduction to the Ho language. Bihar: Xavier Ho.
  • Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to government and binding theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • Lidz, J. (2001). Condition R. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 123-140.
  • Mayuri, J., Subbarao, K., Everaert, M., Maheshwar, R., & Uma, G. (2014). Some Syntactic Aspects of Lexical Anaphors in Select Munda Languages. Mon-Khmer Studies, 43(1), 72-83.
  • Ramamurthy, G. (1931). A manual of the Sora (or Savara) language. Madras: Government Press.
  • Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: Croom Helm.
  • Reinhart, T., & Siloni, T. (2004). Against the unaccusative analysis of reflexives. In A. Alexiadou, E. Anagonstopoulou & M. Everaert (Eds.), The unaccusativity puzzle: Studies on the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 159-180). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Reinhart, T., & Reuland, E. (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 657-720.
  • Rizzi, L. (1986). Null objects in Italian and the theory of pro. Linguistics Inquiry, 17, 501-558.
  • Subbarao, K. V. (2001). Syntactic typological and South Asian languages. In R. Singh (Ed.), The yearbook of South Asian languages and linguistics. (pp. 93-108). New Delhi: Sage.
  • Koh, T. (2009). A Typological Grammar of Ho. Seoul: HUFS Press.