´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

Table of Contents

24±Ç 4È£ (2016³â 12¿ù)

Çѱ¹ÀÎ ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀÚÀÇ Àç±Í´ë¸í»ç ½Àµæ: ºÎºÐÁýÇÕ ¿ø¸® À§¹ÝÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

ÃÖÁ¤¾Æ¡¤ÀÌ¿¹½Ä

Pages : 395-411

DOI :

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Choi, Jeong-A & Lee, Yae-Sheik. (2016). The Acquisition of Reflexive Pronouns by Korean EFL Learners: Focus on their Violation of Subset Principle. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(4), 395-411. This study aims to show that Korean EFL learners acquire English reflexive pronouns in a way of violating Subset Principle in language acquisition. To prove it, this study conducted two experiments of a grammatical judgement test and a story-based truth value judgement test about how Korean learners of English learn reflexive pronouns with two groups of Korean EFL learners : a group of Korean middle school students(n=103), and a group of Korean college students(n=153). This study found that the subjects showed such a tendency that the less they were exposed to English, the wider domain they allowed for the occurrence of reflexive pronouns antecedents, and vice versa. Such a domain narrowing acquisition might support the stance that second language acquisition is also a process of setting parameters as in first language acquisition. The findings of this study hint that Korean EFL learners acquire reflexive pronouns depending on the innate knowledge of Governing Category Parameter(GCP).

Keywords

# Á¦2¾ð¾î ½Àµæ(second language acquisition) # Áö¹è¹üÁÖ ¸Å°³º¯ÀÎ(Governing Category Parameter) # ºÎºÐÁýÇÕ¿ø¸®(The Subset Principle) # º¸Æí¹®¹ý Á¢±Ù(UG Access) # Àç±Í´ë¸í»ç(reflexive prono

References

  • ±èÁ¾º¹. (2009). ¿µ¾î Åë»ç Àṉ̀¸Á¶ÀÇ ÀÌÇØ. Çѱ¹¹®È­»ç. 111-116.
  • ÃÖÁ¤¾Æ. (2016). Çѱ¹ÀÎ ¿µ¾îÇнÀÀÚÀÇ ½Àµæ°úÁ¤¿¡ ´ëÇÑ º¸Æí¹®¹ýÀû Á¢±Ù: Àç±Í´ë¸í»ç Çö»óÀ» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. °æºÏ´ëÇб³ ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
  • Berwick, R. C. (1985). The acquisition of syntactic knowledge. MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1981). On the representation of form and function. The Linguistic Review, 1(1), 3-40.
  • Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hannan, M. (2004). A study of the development of the English verbal morphemes in the grammar of 4-9 year old Bengali-speaking children in the London borough of Tower Hamlets. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Essex.
  • Joo, H. R. (2003). Second language learnability and the acquisition of the argument structure of English locative verbs by Korean speakers. Second Language Research, 19(4), 305-328.
  • MacLaughlin, D. (1993). Second language acquisition and the subset principle. Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development, 17. Boston. MA.
  • Pinker, S. (1989). Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure. MIT Press.
  • Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. IRAL-International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1-4), 209-232.
  • Wexler, K., & Manzini, M. R. (1987). Parameters and learnability in binding theory: Parameter setting. Springer Netherlands, 41-76.
  • White, L. (1989b). Universal grammar and second language acquisition (Vol. 1). John Benjamins Publishing.