´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

Table of Contents

24±Ç 4È£ (2016³â 12¿ù)

An Alternative Approach to Realizations of the Medial [nt] Cluster in English

Chin-Wan Chung

Pages : 1-22

DOI :

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Chung, Chin-Wan. (2016). An Alternative Approach to Realizations of the Medial [nt] Cluster in English. The Linguistic Association of Korean Journal, 24(4), 1-22. This study focuses on the realizations of medial [nt] cluster and provides a foot-based account of it. The analysis argues that the deletion of the [t] occurs only within a foot when the [t] of the [nt] is the onset of a non-head syllable of a trochaic, a dactylic, and a superfoot. This optional deletion in English targets a segment occurring in a prosodically non-prominent syllable. By employing foot-based analytic assumption, we are able to explain extensive realizations of the medial [nt] cluster which includes the examples of aspiration and glottalization of the [t] instead of deletion to avoid the medial [nt] sequence. The aspiration and glottalization examples are problematic to a syllable-based analysis due to its restricted domain. The analysis reveals that English seems to use deletion, glottalization, and foot-structure to avoid the medial [nt] cluster, which is typologically interesting.

Keywords

# constraints # ranking # superfoot # medial cluster # deletion

References

  • Avery, P. and S. Ehrlich. (1992). Teaching American English pronunciation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Beckman, J. (1997). Positional faithfulness, positional neutralization and Shona vowel harmony. Phonology, 14, 1-46.
  • Beckman, J. (1998). Positional faithfulness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  • Beckman, J. (2004). Positional faithfulness. In J. McCarthy (Ed.), Optimality theory: a reader (pp. 130-342). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Borowsky, T. (1986). Topics in the lexical phonology of English. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
  • Chung, C-W. (2007). A constraint-based account of variation in postnasal /t/ deletion in English. Studies in Modern Grammar, 49, 149-175.
  • Chung, C-W. (2009). An asymmetrical realization of nasal-obstruent clusters in English. English Language & Literature Teaching, 15(2), 51-70.
  • Davis, S. & Cho, M-H. (2003). The distribution of aspirated stops and /h/ in American English and Korean: an alignment approach with typological implications. Linguistics, 41(4), 607-652.
  • Davis, S. (2005). Capitalistic v. militaristic: the paradigm uniformity effect reconsidered. In J. Laura, T. A. Hall, and Renate Raffelsiefen (Eds.), Paradigm in phonological theory (pp. 107-121). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Jensen, J. (2000). Against ambisyllabicity. Phonology, 17, 187-235.
  • Ladefoged, P. (2001). A course in phonetics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt College Publishers.
  • Lombard, L. (1999). Positional faithfulness and voicing assimilation in optimality theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 17, 267-303.
  • McCarthy, J. (1994). The phonetic and phonology of Semitic pharyngeals. In P. Keating (Ed.), Phonological structure and phonetic form: Papers in Laboratory Phonology III (191-233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • McCarthy, J. J., & Prince, A. (1995). Faithfulness and reduplicative identity. In J. Beckman, L. W. Dickey, and S. Urbancyzk (Eds.), University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18 (pp. 249-348). Amherst, MA: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
  • Pater, J. (1996). *NC̥. In K. Kusumoto (Ed), Proceedings of NELS 26 (pp. 227-239). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
  • Pater, J. (1999). Autronesian nasal substitution and other NC̥ effects. In R. Kager, H. Van der Hulst & W. Sonneveld (Eds.), The phonology-morphology interface (310-343). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Pater, J. (2004). Autronesian nasal substitution and other NC̥ effects. In J. McCarthy (Ed.), Optimality theory: a reader (pp. 271-289). Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. (1993). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Unpublished manuscript. Rutgers University and University of Colorado, Boulder.
  • Prince, A. and P. Smolensky. (2004). Optimality theory: constraint interaction in generative grammar. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
  • Wolfram, W. & Johnson, R. (2003). Phonological Analysis: Focus on American English. Seoul: Pearson Education Korea LTD.