대한언어학회 전자저널

대한언어학회

Table of Contents

24권 3호 (2016년 9월)

한정적 목적어 전치 구문에 관한 연구

서소영

Pages : 189-206

DOI :

PDF보기

리스트

Abstract

Seo, Soyoung. (2016). Studies on the inversion of the Definite Object. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(3), 189-206. In Spanish, the object pronouns replace objects previously mentioned to avoid unnecessarily repeating them. This object pronouns is placed in front of the verb, replacing any article used with the object previously. However in Spanish the object complements can appear in front of the verb like the subject. In this case, we examine the use of a redundant object pronoun. In concrete, when a noun object, direct or indirect precedes the verb, the corresponding redundant object pronouns is always used. In this paper, we have argued that the object pronouns can be defined as a functional head D(eterminant). And we have proposed that this D is attached to the functional head Topic in order to check the feature Topic.

Keywords

# 목적격 대명사(the object pronouns) # 목적 보어(the object complements) # 잉여적인 목적격 대명사(a redundant object pronoun) # 기능 핵 Determinant(the functional head D) # 기능 핵 Topic(

References

  • Alconchel, G. (2002), “Procesos de gramaticalización del español clásico al moderno”. In Echenique Elizondo, M, T. & Sánchez Méndez (ed.), Actas del V Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española, I, 103-121, Madrid: Gredos.
  • Alexiadou, A. & E. Anagnostopoulou. (1998). “Parametrizing AGR: Word Order, V-Movement and EPP-Checking”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 491-539.
  • Aoun, J. (1981). The Formal Nature of Anaphoric Relations, Ph. D. Dissertation. MIT.
  • Bello, A. (1981), Gramática de la Lengua Castellana, Cabildo Insular de Tenerife.
  • Chomsky, N. (1989). “Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation”, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 43-74.
  • Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program, Cambridge, MIT Press.
  • Chomsky, N. (1998). “Minimalist Inquiries: the Framework”, ms., MIT.
  • Chomsky, N. (1999). “Derivation by Phase”, MIT Occasional papers in Linguistics, 15.
  • Contreras, H. (1991). “On the Position of Subject”, In Roth Stein, S. (ed.), Perspectives on Phrase Structure: Heads and Licensing (Syntas & Semantics 25), 63-79, San Diego: Academic Press.
  • Germán F, W. (1999). “Sobre las oraciones impersonales y pasivas con SE”, Onomazein, 4, 155-167.
  • Gili Gaya, S. (1979). Curso Superior de Sintaxis Española, Madrid: Edaf.
  • Groppi, M. (2008), “Duplicaciones pronominales: síntesis de puntos clave”, ms.
  • Halle, M. & Marantz, A. (1993). “Distributed Morphology”. In K. Hale & J. Keyser (eds.): The View from Building 20, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Jaeggli, O. (1982). Topics in Romance Syntax, Foris: Dordrecht.
  • Javier, G. R. & Melvin G, R. (2012), “Spanish Predicative Verbless Clauses and the Left Periphery”, ms.
  • Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Mendikoetxea, A. (1993). “Los clíticos como categorías subléxicas de concordancia”, en Olga F.Soriano (ed): Los pronombres átonos, 205-230, Madrid: Taurus Ediciones.
  • Milsark, G. (1974). Existential Sentences in English, Ph.D.dissertation, MIT.
  • Olga, F, Soriano. (1989). Rección y Ligamiento en español: Aspectos del parametro del sujeto nulo, Ph. D. Dissertation, UAM.
  • Olga, F, Soriano. (1999). “Leísmo, laísmo y loísmo”. In Bosque, M, I & Demonte, B, V. (eds): Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, 1, 1317-1397, Madrid: Espasa Calpe.
  • Ordóñez, F. (1997). Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages, New York: The City University of New York Dissertation.
  • Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Ramírez, F, M. (2010), “La función sintáctica de sujeto: definición, rasgos descriptivos y normativos”, Revista de filología, 28, 199-213.
  • Ticio, E. (2005). “NP-Ellipsis in Spanish”, in D. Eddington (ed.), Selected Proceedings of the 7th Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, 128-141, Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.
  • Treviño, E. (1990). “Non-Canonical Subjects in Spanish: Evidence from Causatives and Psych Verbs”, University of Ottawa, Unpublished Manuscript.
  • Vallduvi, E. (1990). The informational component, New York: Garland.
  • Vivanco, M. (2013), “La noción de tópico en la evolución de la duplicación clítica”, Dicenda, Cuadernos de Filología Hispánica, 31, 229-249.
  • Wirnsberger, M. (2006), “El complemento indirecto y los dativos del castellano”, ms.
  • Zubizarreta, M, L. (1998). Prosody, Focus and Word Order, Cambridge: MIT Press.