대한언어학회 전자저널

Park, Kiseong. (2016). A Comparative Study on the AND-constructions in English and Their Corresponding -ko/-wa Constructions in Korean. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 24(2), 183-196. The purpose of this paper is to compare English AND conjunction constructions and their corresponding -ko and -wa constructions in Korean in terms of NP-level and clausal level conjunctions. The followings are discussed in this paper. First, it is argued that the juncture-nexus theory and Interclausal Relations Hierarchy in RRG are needed to explain the syntax-semantics interfaces in both English AND constructions and Korean -wa and -ko constructions. Second, it is claimed that English NP-level AND constructions have the features of AND-languages, while Korean -wa constructions have the mixtures of AND-languages and WITH-languages. It is also claimed that both coordination and cosubordination junctures are realized in NP level English AND constructions and Korean -wa constructions. The differences in juncture types are argued to be related to the semantic effects such as joint vs. split readings and collective vs. distributive readings. Third, it is claimed that English AND constructions in clausal level typically involve coordination junctures, while Korean -ko constructions involve both coordination and cosubordination junctures under the conditions of sharing the same subjects and the same tenses. The cosubordination junctures in Korean typically involve the semantic effects such as cause-effect relations and temporal sequences.

# 등종속(cosubordination) # 의미역지시문법(RRG) # 정쳐-넥서스(juncture nexus) # AND-언어/WITH-언어(AND-languages/WITH-languages)

• 강영세. (2006). and-등위접속의 화용론. 어문학논총, 25. 197-205.
• 권재일. (2012). 한국어 문법론. 서울: 태학사.
• 김건희. (2014). 대등과 종속에 관한 일고찰. 인문논총, 71(3), 117-157.
• 송경안 송진희. (2006). 등위접속구문의 유형론적 연구. 독일언어문학, 31. 73-97.
• 이관규. (1999). 대등문 종속문 부사절 구문의 변별 특성. 선청어문, 27. 753-780.
• 조의연. (2003). 인지의미론에서 본 영어 상호-사건 관계 ‘and’ 접속구문: 진정한 등위접속인가? 담화와인지, 10(2), 177-195.
• Culicover, P. and R. Jackendoff. (1997). Semantic subordination despite syntactic coordination. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 195-217.
• Feldman, A. (2002). On NP-coordination. In S. Baauw et al.(Eds.), The UiL OTS 2002 Yearbook(pp. 39-66). Utrecht, the Netherlands.
• Foley, W. and R. Van Valin. (1984). Functional syntax and universal grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Haspelmath, M. (2007). Coordination. In Shopen, T.(Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description: Complex constructions(pp. 1-51). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Haspelmath, M. (2004). Coordinating constructions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Heycock, C. and R. Zamparelli. (2005). Friends and colleagues: plurality, coordination, and the structure of DP. Natural Language Semantics, 13, 201-270.
• Kwon, N. (2004). Syntactic and semantic mismatches in the Korean ko-construction. WCCFL 23 Proceedings, 101-114.
• Li, C. and S. Thompson. (1976). Subject and topic: A new typology of language. In C. Li(Ed.), Subject and topic(pp. 457-490). New York: Academic Press.
• Sohn, H. (1999). The Korean language. Cambridge: Cambrdige University Press.
• Stassen, L. (2001). Noun phrase coordination. In M. Haspelmath, E. König, W. Oesterreicher and W. Raible(Eds.), Language typology and language universal(pp. 1105-1111). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
• Stassen, L. (2000). AND-languages and WITH-languages. Linguistic Typology, 4, 1-54.
• Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics(vol. 1). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Van Valin, R. (2001). The acquisition of complex sentences: a case study in the role of theory in the study of language development. ms. SUNY at Buffalo.
• Van Valin, R. (2005). Exploring the syntax-semantics interface. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Van Valin, R. (2014). On the place of information structure in a grammar. From http://wings.buffalo.edu/linguistics//people/faculty/vanvalin/rrg
• Yang, B. (1994). Morphosyntactic phenomena of Korean in Role and Reference Grammar: Paych-verb constructions, inflectional verb morphemes, complex sentences, and relative clauses. Ph.D. dissertation, SUNY at Buffalo.