´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

23±Ç 4È£ (2015³â 12¿ù)

¿µ¾î Out-of V-ing »ç¿ª±¸¹®: ¸»¹¶Ä¡ ÀڷḦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î

½É ·Ï․±èÁ¾º¹

Pages : 189-210

DOI :

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Sim, Rok & Kim, Jong-Bok. (2015). The transitive out-of V-ing construction in English: Corpus-based study. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 23(4), 189-210. The transitive out-of V-ing construction has bloomed in recent and current English. However, since the out-of V-ing pattern has remained rare, it has been overlooked in the literature for long. This paper is the corpus-based investigation of the construction and will shed the light on the questions which were intrigued in terms of lexical creativity including syntactic and semantic variation in the matrix verb. The paper also supports the past research on Constructional Approach to the construction with a range of corpus data and sketches a Construction Grammar analysis to account for the grammatical properties of the out-of V-ing construction. In particular, it shows that the construction inherits properties from transitive construction and caused-motion construction and shares properties with resultative construction, but is distinctive from these with respect to the entailment relationship of the gerundive phrase.

Keywords

# ±¸¹®¹®¹ý(Construction grammar) # ÄÚÇÏ(COHA) # ¸»¹¶Ä¡(corpus) # Ÿµ¿±¸¹®(transitive) # »ç¿ªÀ̵¿±¸¹®(caused-motion) # °á°ú ±¸¹®(resultative)

References

  • Francis, G., Hunston, S., & Manning, E. (1996). Collins Cobuild Grammar Patterns 1: Verbs. London: HarperCollins.
  • Gawlik, O. (2013). On the transitive ¡°out of -ing¡± complementation pattern in contemporary spoken American English: A corpus-based study. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 49(2), 167-183.
  • Goldberg, A. (1995). Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Goldberg, A. (2006). Constructions at Work: Constructionist Approaches in Context. NewYork: Oxford University Press.
  • Hunston, S., & Francis, G. (2000). Pattern Grammar: A Corpus-Driven Approach to the Lexical Grammar of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Kim, J. B., & Davies, M. (2015). The INTO-CAUSATIVE construction in English: a construction-based perspective. To appear in English language and linguistics.
  • Rudanko, J. (2006). Emergent Alternation in Complement Selection: The spread of the Transitive into -ing Construction in British and American English. English Linguistics, 34(4), 312-331.
  • Rudanko, J. (2011). Chapter 5. Tracking and Explaining the Transitive out of -ing Pattern in Recent and Current English. Changes in Complementation in British and American English: Corpus-Based Studies on Non-Finite Complements in Recent English. Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Rudanko, J., & Rickman, P. (2014). Null Objects and Sentential Complements, with Evidence from the Corpus of Historical American English. In K. Davidse, C. Gentens, L. Ghesquière, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Corpus Interrogation and Grammatical Patterns, 209-221. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Saeed, J. I. (2003). Semantics (Introducing Linguistics). Blackwell Publishing Press Oxford.
  • Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.