´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

30±Ç 4È£ (2022³â 12¿ù)

Çѱ¹¾î º¸Á¶»ç ¡®-µµ¡¯ÀÇ ÃÊÁ¡¿µ¿ªÈ®Àå¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

Á¶±âÇö

Pages : 85-103

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2022.30.4.85

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Joh, Gi-Hyun. (2022). A study of focus domain expansion in the Korean delimiter ¡®-do¡¯ construction. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 30(4), 85-103. This paper aims to investigate the focus domain expansion phenomenon in the Korean delimiter ¡®-do¡¯ construction. For this, Chung(2021)¡¯s oblique merge analysis is critically reviewed, the main idea of which is that thematic elements of a verb are formed as a complex focus cluster via the oblique merge operation in overt syntax. I point out that potential problems arise from the oblique merge operation itself, including binding, c-command, case licensing, and adverb interruption. I argue that the problems with Chung¡®s oblique merge analysis are fundamentally caused by the systematic limit under the presupposed head-final structure for Korean. As an alternative, I propose that under the head-initial structure for Korean, the focus complex elements in question can be derived by raising the Del(imiter)P to the focus element, or a chain can be formed between the focus element and the DelP by the movement of the null operator of ¡®-do,¡¯ in either case by QR at LF.

Keywords

# º¸Á¶»ç±¸(delimiter phrase) # Çپ(head-initial) # ¾çÈ­»ç À̵¿ (quantifier raising) # ÃÊÁ¡¿µ¿ª(focus domain expansion) # »ç¼±Àû º´ÇÕ (oblique merge)

References

  • ÀÌÁ¤½Ä. (2016). ±¹¾î Åë»ç±¸Á¶ »õ·Î º¸±â: Çپ ±¸Á¶ÀÇ °üÁ¡¿¡¼­. ¼­¿ï: Çѱ¹¹®È­»ç.
  • ÀÌÁ¤½Ä, Á¶±âÇö. (2016). ±¹¾î Á¶°¢±¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºÐ¼®. ¾ð¾îÇÐ ¿¬±¸, 39, 231-250.
  • Á¤´ëÈ£. (2021). Çѱ¹¾î ´ÙÁßÃÊÁ¡±¸¹®°ú »ç¼±Àû ÀÏÄ¡/º´ÇÕ. ¼­¿ï: Çѱ¹¹®È­»ç.
  • An, D.-H. (2015). An alternative possibility for focus domain expansion: A reply to Chung 2014. Studies in Generative Grammar, 25(1), 321-332.
  • Chung, D.-H. (1997). WH-scope identification via quasi-binding. Japanese/ Korean Linguistics, 7, 293-302.
  • Chung, D.-H. (2015). An oblique merge analysis of multi-elemental fragment answers in Korean. In Proceedings of the 17th Seoul International Conference on Generative Grammar, 68-93.
  • Kayne, R. (1994). The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  • Koizumi, M. (1995). Phrase structure in minimalist syntax. doctoral dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • Takano, Y. (2002). Surprising constituents. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 11, 243-301.
  • Watanabe, A. (1992). Subjacency and s-structure movement of wh-in-situ. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 255-291.