´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

30±Ç 4È£ (2022³â 12¿ù)

ºñÇ¥ÁØ Á¾°á¾î¹Ì ¡®-À»±î¿ä?¡¯¿Í ¡®-½Ç°Ô¿ä¡¯ ºÐ¼®

À±ÀçÇÐ ¡¤ ±è±â±¹

Pages : 63-84

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2022.30.4.63

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Yoon, Jae-Hak & Kim, Gigook. (2022). An analysis of non-standard sentence endings ulkkayo? and silkeyyo. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 30(4), 63-84. Examining two non-standard sentence endings in Korean, we make an observation about the ulkkayo? form and make a case for a grammaticalization process for the silkeyyo form that provides a more intuitive explanation than in previous studies. An emerging non-standard use of the ulkkayo? form involves questions about something the listener must have direct access to, such as his or her own current state of mind or the number of his or her children, whereas the modality of the ulkkayo? form only describes a conjecture or surmise. It is illustrated that its anomaly derives from an incompatibility between questioned topics and the weak modal force of the form. The other non-standard sentence ending, the silkeyyo form, is an odd combination of the honorific marker si and ulkeyyo, the first person sentence ending, because rules prohibit self-honorification. It is hypothesized that this is the result of a grammaticalization process where a speaker utters the listener's expected answer, thereby shortening a conversational exchange in a hectic customer-service interaction. It is observed that the emergence of these non-standard forms reflects a society where politeness in the public sphere remains a high priority. Even when time efficiency forces a grammaticalization, it appears that a considerable effort is exerted to preserve a high level of politeness.

Keywords

# °ø¼Õ¼º(politeness) # ¹®¹ýÈ­(grammaticalization) # ºñÇ¥ÁØ Á¾°á¾î¹Ì (non-standard sentence endings) # ½Ç°Ô¿ä(silkeyyo) # À»±î¿ä?(ulkkayo?)

References

  • °­¿µ¸®. (2016). ¡®-¤©±î¡¯ÀÇ ÀÇÇâ ¿ë¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸. ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ ¼®»çÇÐÀ§³í¹®.
  • ±èÇϼö. (1979). ¡®-¤©±î¡¯ÀÇ ÀÇ¹Ì¿Í Åë»çÀû Ư¡. ¿Ü±¹¾î·Î¼­ÀÇ Çѱ¹¾î±³À°, 4, 55-78.
  • ¹Ú¹ÌÀº. (2016). Áö½Ã È­Çà¿¡ »ç¿ëµÇ´Â ¡°-(À¸)½Ç°Ô¿ä¡± ¿¬±¸. Çѱ¹¾î ÀǹÌÇÐ, 51, 137-154.
  • ¹ÚÀ翬. (2006). Çѱ¹¾î ¾çÅ ¾î¹Ì ¿¬±¸. ¼­¿ï: ÅÂÇлç.
  • ¹ÚÀ翬. (2013). Çѱ¹¾î Àǵµ °ü·Ã ¾î¹ÌÀÇ È¯À¯Àû È®Àå. ±¹¾îÇÐ, 68, 253-288.
  • ¾ÈÁÖÈ£. (2017). Á¾°á¾î¹Ì {-(À¸)½Ç°Ô¿ä}ÀÇ ±â´É°ú Çü¼º°úÁ¤. ´ãÈ­¿Í ÀÎÁö, 24(1), 47-67.
  • À±ÀçÇÐ. (2000). ¿¬Á¢Àû ¡®À̳ª¡¯. ¾ð¾î¿Í Á¤º¸, 4(2), 41-54.
  • ÀÓµ¿ÈÆ. (2001). ¡®°Ú¡¯ÀÇ ¿ë¹ý°ú ¿ª»çÀû Çؼ®. ±¹¾îÇÐ, 37, 115-147.
  • Á¶¼÷ȯ. (2009). ±¹¾î ÀνľçÅÂ¼Ò ±¸Á¶ÀÇ ÀÎÁö¾ð¾îÇÐÀû Á¢±Ù: ½ÃÁ¡ À̵¿°ú ¿ªµ¿Àû ½É¼º °ø°£ÀÇ À¶ÇÕ. ¾ð¾î, 34(1), 113-132.
  • Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Kamp, H. (1978). Semantics versus pragmatics. In G. Guenthner & S. J. Schmit (Eds.), Formal semantics and pragmatics for natural languages (pp. 255-287). Reidel: Dordrecht.
  • Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, R. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's. In Papers from the 9th regional meeting, 292-305.
  • Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
  • Yoon, J.-H. (2021). Semantic inflation and pronoun avoidance. Linguistic Research, 38(3), 469-490.