대한언어학회 전자저널

Kang, Seokhan. (2022). A longitudinal study of foreign learners pronunciation of Korean as a foreign language. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 30(1), 1-21. This study investigated the role of academic level when foreign learners of Korean study its pronunciation for six months. The subjects were classified into three groups according to their academic levels (high school graduates, undergraduate students, graduate students). The four constructs of Korean pronunciation holistic evaluation, fluency, comprehensibility, and intelligibility were applied to the 26 subjects pronunciation. Five professional Korean raters assessed Korean language learners oral performance both in the 1st month and the 7th month of their Korean language training. The results are as follows: (1) holistic ratings were closely related with those of fluency and comprehensibility, (2) the groups of university students showed the fastest development, especially of fluency, (3) the more they used Korean outside of the classroom, the higher their target language pronunciation scores they achieved. Also face-to-face contact between natives and non-natives exerts a positive effect on the acquisition of a fluent Korean pronunciation. The result supports evidence that the Korean raters evaluation correlated strongly with fluency level but weakly with intelligibility level. This implies that Korean language education should focus more on explicit learning and teaching.

# 한국어 발음(Korean pronunciation) # 발음 평가(pronunciation assessment) # 이해도(comprehensibility) # 명료도(intelligibility) # 유창도 (fluency) # 제2 언어 평가(second language assessment) # 학력 수준(academic levels)

• 강석한. (2022). 영어와 한국어 유창성 이해 및 평가. 서울: 신아출판사.
• 강석한. (2018). 영어와 한국어의 L2 유창성 습득 및 판단 비교 연구: 체류 경험을 중심 으로. 이중언어학, 71, 1-36.
• 김경선, 이규민, 강승혜. (2010). 일반화가능도 이론을 적용한 한국어 말하기 성취도 평 가의 신뢰도와 오차요인 분석. 한국어 교육, 21(4), 51-75.
• 김나미, 김영주. (2018). 발음 유창성 평가에서의 평가 구인 간 상관관계: 한국어 중급 학습자의 발화를 중심으로. 한국어 의미학, 59, 87-108.
• 김옥기, 강석한. (2020). 영어권 및 중국어권 한국어 학습자의 유창성 습득 종단 초기 연 구. 한국어 교육, 31(2), 29-52.
• 김태경, 박초롱. (2015). 외국어로서의 한국어 발화 유창성 변화 연구: 중국어 모어 화자 를 대상으로. 언어과학연구, 75, 129-150.
• 박기영. (2010). 한국어 음운론과 한국어 발음 교육의 상관성에 대한 일고찰: 자모 교육 과 음운 변동 교육을 중심으로. 어문론집, 43, 7-30.
• 백소영. (2010). 한국어 통합 교재를 통한 발음 교육 고찰. 시학과 언어학, 18, 119-138. 송윤경, 김윤신, 이동은. (2012). 중국인 한국어 학습자의 발음과 억양 연구: 요청/거절 화행을 중심으로. 언어학, 62, 145-171.
• 송향근. (2011). 음운 이론과 한국어 발음 교육. 한국어학, 50, 1-27.
• 유현정. (2013). 국어교육, 한국어교육: 한국어 교재의 발음교육 방안 연구-발음교육의 내용과 방법을 중심으로. 한성어문학, 32, 489-511.
• 이정희. (2010). 인식 조사를 통한 한국어 구어 유창성의 개념 및 요인 연구. 한국어 교 육, 21(4), 183-204.
• 이향. (2013). 발음 평가에 있어서 정확성, 유창성, 이해명료성, 이해가능성 기준 간의 영 향 관계 연구. 언어와 문화, 9(3), 221-243.
• 임우열, 김영주. (2014). 한국어 고급 학습자의 발음 숙달도와 발음 학습 전략 사용 간의 관계 연구. 한국어 교육, 25(4), 189-218
• 장향실. (2002). 중국어 모국어 화자의 한국어 학습시 나타나는 발음상의 오류와 그 교 육 방안. 한국어학, 15, 211-227.
• 최정순. (2012). 한국어 발음 교육의 현황과 과제. 언어와 문화, 8(3), 295-324.
• 홍진혁. (2018). 라오스인 학습자를 위한 한국어 발음 교육 연구. 서울대학교 박사학위 논문.
• Alejandro, G. R. (2019). A closer look at TOEFL speaking assessment test. A guide to teaching TOEFL iBT speaking. Unpublished master’s thesis. University of San Francisco, California, USA.
• Barefoot, S. M., Bochner, J. H., Johnson, B. A., & Eigen, B. A. V. (1993). Rating deaf speakers’ comprehensibility: An exploratory investigation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 2(3), 31-35.
• Bleistein, T., Smith, M. K., & Lewis, M. (2013). Teaching speaking. In TESOL International Association (Eds.), A guide to teaching TOEFL iBT speaking (pp. 45-65). Boston: TESOL publications.
• Burda, A. N., Hageman, C. F., Scherz, J. A., & Edwards, H. T. (2003). Age and understanding speakers with Spanish or Taiwanese accents. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97(1), 11-20.
• Council of Europe. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Strasbourg: Cambridge University Press.
• De Jong, N. H., Steinel, M. P., Florijn, A., Schoonen, R., & Hulstijn, J. H. (2012). The effect of task complexity on functional adequacy, fluency and lexical diversity in speaking performances of native and non-native speakers. In A. Housen, F. Kuiken, & I. Vedder (Eds.), Dimensions of L2 performance and proficiency: Complexity, accuracy and fluency in SLA (pp. 121-142). Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company.
• Derwing, T. (2003). What do ESL students say about their accents? Canadian Modern Language Review, 59(4), 547-567.
• Derwing, T. M., & Munro, M. J. (1997). Accent, intelligibility, and comprehensibility: Evidence from four L1s. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 1-16.
• Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., & Thomson, R. I. (2008). A longitudinal study of ESL learners\' fluency and comprehensibility development. Applied Linguistics, 29(3), 359-380.
• Derwing, T. M., Munro, M. J., Thomson, R. I., & Rossiter, M. J. (2009). The relationship between L1 fluency and L2 fluency development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 31(4), 533-557.
• Derwing, T., Rossiter, M., & Thomson, R. (2004). L2 fluency: Judgments on different tasks. Language Learning, 54(4), 655-679.
• Dewaele, J. M. (2002). Psychological and sociodemographic correlates of communicative anxiety in L2 and L3 production. International Journal of Bilingualism, 6(1), 23-38.
• Dewey, D. P., Bown, J., & Eggett, D. (2012). Japanese language proficiency, social networking, and language use during study abroad: Learners’ perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 68(2), 111-137.
• Du, H. (2013). The development of Chinese fluency during study abroad in China. The Modern Language Journal, 97(1), 131-143.
• Ellis, R., & Yuan, F. (2004). The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), 59-84.
• Freed, B., So, S., & Lazar, N. A. (2003). Language learning abroad: How do gains in written fluency compare with gains in oral fluency in French as a second language? ADFL Bulletin, 34(3), 34-40.
• Gorsuch, G. J. (2011). Improving speaking fluency for international teaching assistants by increasing input. Tesl-Ej, 14(4), 114-123.
• Gut, U. (2015). Bilingual acquisition of intonation: a study of children speaking German and English, Berlin: Walter de Gruyter GmbH & Co KG.
• Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301-315.
• Kang, S. (2012). A study on the fluency judgement of the suprasegmentals for the native English and Japanese learners of Korean. Bilingual Research, 50, 1-24.
• Kang, S. (2013). The Evaluation of L2 pronunciation by the raters’ language background. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 21(4), 99-117.
• Kormos, J. (1999). Simulating conversations in oral-proficiency assessment: A conversation analysis of role plays and non-scripted interviews in language exams. Language Testing, 16(2), 163-188.
• Moyer, A. (2005). Formal and informal experiential realms in German as a foreign language: A preliminary investigation. Foreign Language Annals, 38(3), 377-387.
• Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (1995). Foreign accent, comprehensibility, and intelligibility in the speech of second language learners. Language Learning, 45(1), 73-97.
• Munro, M. J., Derwing, T. M., & Morton, S. L. (2006). The mutual intelligibility of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 111-131.
• Ortega, L. (1999). Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 109-148.
• Pennington, M. C. (1989). Teaching pronunciation from the top down. RELC Journal, 20(1), 20-38.
• Rossiter, M. J., Derwing, T. M., Manimtim, L. G., & Thomson, R. I. (2010). Oral fluency: The neglected component in the communicative language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 66(4), 583-606.
• Saito, K., Tran, M., Suzukida, Y., Sun, H., Magne, V., & Ilkan, M. (2019). How do second language listeners perceive the comprehensibility of foreign-accented speech? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(5), 1133-1149.
• Segalowitz, N. (2010). Cognitive bases of second language fluency. Cambridge: Routledge. Segalowitz, N., & Dewey, P. (2004). Context of learning and second language fluency in French: Comparing regular classroom, study abroad, and intensive domestic immersion programs. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(2), 275-301.
• Skehan, P., & Foster, P. (1999). The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings. Language Learning, 49(1), 93-120.
• Smith, L. E., & Nelson, C. L. (1985). International intelligibility of English: Directions and resources. World Englishes, 4(3), 333-342.
• Towell, R., Hawkins, R., & Bazergui, N. (1996). The development of fluency in advanced learners of French. Applied Linguistics, 17(1), 84-119.