대한언어학회 전자저널

Shin, Sungkyun. (2019). On the functions of the simple present tense in The Pilgrims Progress. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 27(4), 91-103. Contrary to Pascals (1965) claim, the simple present tense (SP) in the narrative told in the preterit in The Pilgrims Progress signifies more than experiences of daily affairs, and we may categorize the SP in Pilgrims Progress into three types: first, SP describing eternal truths, timeless statement, or generics, focusing on eternal truths, such as eternal dwelling in Heaven with the eternal God, the eternal invitation to all human beings from the eternal God, and being alert and on guard as a true pilgrim shown in true pilgrimage, awakened from spiritual slumber. Second, the SP is also used as the historical present (HP), to convey a vivid description of a certain past event, giving the reader a feeling of being there as an observer, such as conveying the threat of Giant Despair through the use of SP forms like getteth (gets), goes, falls, and beats, and thereby warning against falling into true despair. Finally, SP also describes an ordinary life in the sense that John Bunyans main purpose is to describe what an ordinary person (an everyman figure) is likely to experience daily in the trials and adventures encountered traveling from his/her home, the worldly city, to the heavenly kingdom. The excellence of Bunyans writing lies in his success evoking in his readers the daily reality of the story he presented as his dreams by employing SP with three types of function.

# function # the simple present tense # historical present # The Pilgrim’s Progress

• Algeo, J., & Butcher, C. A. (2014). The origins and development of the English language. Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
• Bunyan, J. (1678). The pilgrim’s progress (Part I). Published 2014. Minneapolis: Desiring God. www.desiringGod.org
• Bunyan, J. (1684). The pilgrim’s progress. (Part II). J. B. Wharey, revised by R. Sharrock. (1960). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of language: Its nature, origin and use. New York: Praeger.
• Chomsky, N. (2006). Approaching UG from below. Unpublished paper. MIT.
• Curme, G.O. (1931). Syntax. Boston: D.C.Heath and Company.
• Enos, R. (1981). The use of the historical present in the Gospel according to St. Mark,. Linguistic Association of the Southwest Journal, 3(4), 281-298.
• Fludernik, M. (1992). The historical present tense in English literature: An oral pattern and its literary adaptation. Language and Literature, 17, 77-107.
• Higuchi, M. (1996). The simple present tense used as historical present in English. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147423602.pdf
• Horner, B. (2003). The pilgrim\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\'s progress – Accurate revised text. Bunyan Ministries. Lindenhurst: Reformation Press.
• Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K.. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Jespersen, O. (1965/1909-1949). A Modern English grammar on historical principles. Copenhagen: George Allen & Unwin.
• Kiparsky, P. (1968). Tense and Mood in Indo-European. Foundations of Language, 4, 30-57.
• Leech, G. (1971). Meaning and the English verb. London: Longman.
• Leung, M. M. (2008). The narrative function and verbal aspect of the historical present in the Fourth Gospel. JETS, 51(4), 703-720.
• McKay, K. L. (1974). Further remarks on the ‘Historical’ present and other phenomena. Foundations of Language, 11, 247-251.
• O’Rourke, J. J. (1974). The historic present in the Gospel of John. Journal of Biblical Literature, 93(4), 585-590.
• Palmer, F. R. (1965). A linguistic study of the English verb. London: Longman.
• Pascal, R. (1965). The present tense in The Pilgrim’s Progress. MLR, LX, 13-16.
• Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, J., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London and New York: Longman.
• Radford, A. (2009). Analysing English sentences: A Minimalist approach. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Radford, A. (2016). Analysing English sentences (2nd ed.). Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Schiffrin, D. (1981). Tense variation in narrative. Language, 57(1), 45-62.
• Shin, S. (2016). Chomsky’s fallacies of merge mutation(s) with respect to abstractness of English. Studies in Linguistics, 39, 163-187.
• Shin, S. (2019a). A diachronic study of the simple present tense in English: Focusing on the present perfect progressive. Paper presented at the Spring Conference of ELSOK on June, 2019.
• Shin, S. (2019b) A diachronic study of the historical present in English. Paper presented at the Spring Conference of JELLA and JWL in 2019.
• Steadman, J. M. Jr. (1917). The origin of the historical present in English. Studies in Philology, 14(1), 1-46.
• Wolfson, Nessa. (1978). A feature of performed narrative: the conversational historical present. Language in Society, 7, 215-237.
• Wolfson, Nessa. (1979). The conversational historical present alternation. Language, 55, 168-182.
• The Historical Present. Retrieved April 22th, 2019 from https://learningenglish.voanews.com/a/everyday-grammar-reported-speech-and-historic-present-tense/4010017.html
• EnglishCafe. Retrieved April 22th, 2019 from https://www.englishcafe.jp/englishcollege/etense2/e1-2-1.html