´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î
-
±èÁ¤Àº ½Ã´ëÀÇ ºÏÇÑ °í±ÞÁßÇб³ ¿µ¾î±³°ú¼ Àбâ Áö¹® ³»¿ë ºÐ¼®
-
Çѱ¹¾î ¼±¾î¸» ¾î¹Ì ¡®-½Ã-¡®ÀÇ »ç¹° ³ôÀÓ Çö»ó°ú °ø¼Õ Àü·«Àû »ç¿ë
-
¿µ¾î´É·ÂÀ¸·Î ÀÔÇÐÇÑ ¿Ü±¹ÀÎÀ¯ÇлýµéÀÇ Çѱ¹¾î¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Åµµº¯È ¿¬±¸
-
Anyway as an Unassociative Stance Marker in the American Television Talk Show, Larry King Live
-
Influences of a Native English Teacher and Roles of a Co-teacher on L2 Learners' Learning Styles
-
On the Functions of the Simple Present Tense in The Pilgrim¡¯s Progress
-
Teaching English through Vlogging and In-class Presentation: A Preliminary Comparative Study
27±Ç 4È£ (2019³â 12¿ù)
- Çѱ¹¾î ¼±¾î¸» ¾î¹Ì ¡®-½Ã-¡®ÀÇ »ç¹° ³ôÀÓ Çö»ó°ú °ø¼Õ Àü·«Àû »ç¿ë
-
ÃÖ¼ºÈ
Pages : 37-51
Abstract
Keywords
# ¼±¾î¸» ¾î¹Ì ¡®-½Ã-¡¯(pre-final ending ¡®-si-¡¯) # »ç¹° ÁÖü ³ôÀÓ(inanimate subject honorification) # ûÀÚ ³ôÀÓ(hearer honorification) # ¼ö¿ë¼º ÆÇ´Ü(acceptability judgement) # °ÅÀý ÈÇà(refusal speech act) # ü¸é À§Çù ÇàÀ§(face threatening act) # °ø¼Õ¼º(politeness)
References
- ±èÀºÇý. (2016). Çѱ¹¾î ¼±¾î¸» ¾î¹Ì '-½Ã-'ÀÇ »ç¹° Á¸´ë ±â´É. »çȸ¾ð¾îÇÐ, 24(1), 91-113.
- ¸ñÁ¤¼ö. (2013). ¼±¾î¸»¾î¹Ì '-½Ã-'ÀÇ ±â´É°ú ÁÖ¾î Á¸´ë. ±¹¾îÇÐ, 67, 63-105.
- ¹ÎÁöÇý. (2014). '-½Ã-'ÀÇ È®´ë »ç¿ë ¾ç»ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹®¹ý ±³À°Àû ¿¬±¸. ¼®»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®, ÀÌÈ¿©ÀÚ´ëÇб³ ±³À°´ëÇпø.
- ¹Ú¼®ÁØ. (2002). Çö´ë±¹¾î ¼±¾î¸»¾î¹Ì '-½Ã-'¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸. ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®, ¿¬¼¼´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø.
- ¹Ú¼®ÁØ. (2004). ¼±¾î¸»¾î¹Ì "-½Ã-"ÀÇ ¹®¹ý¿ÜÀû ¿ë¹ý¿¡ °üÇÏ¿©. ÇѸ»¿¬±¸, 14, 201-220.
- ¹é¼ö¿¬. (2017). Çѱ¹¾î ÁÖüÁ¸´ë ¼±¾î¸»¾î¹Ì '-½Ã-'ÀÇ °ø¼Õ Àü·«°ú ±× À¯¿ëÀû È®Àå: ÆǸŠ´ãÈ ºÐ¼®À» Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î. ¼®»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®, ¼¿ï´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø.
- À̵οø. (2014). ¿µ¾îÀÇ Ã»ÀÚÁ¸ÄªÀ» ÅëÇØ º» »ç¹°ÁÖüÁ¸Äª. Àι®°úÇבּ¸, 42, 201-223.
- ÀÌ·¡È£. (2012). ¼±¾î¸» ¾î¹Ì '-½Ã-'ÀÇ Ã»ÀÚ Á¸´ë ±â´É¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂû. ¾ð¾îÇבּ¸, 23, 147-166.
- ÀÌ»ó±Ù. (2017). ½ÇÇèÅë»ç·ÐÀÇ Çü½ÄÀû ¿¬±¸¹æ¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °íÂû. »ý¼º¹®¹ý¿¬±¸, 27(2), 395-429.
- À̼ö¿¬. (2012). ¼ºñ½º¾÷ Á¾»çÀÚµéÀÇ ¾ð¾î »ç¿ë ¾ç»ó. ¾î¹®¿¬±¸, 71, 79-97.
- À̼÷ÀÇ. (2015). ³ôÀÓ ¼±¾î¸» ¾î¹Ì '-½Ã-'¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©. Çѱ¹¾îÇÐ, 66, 215-244.
- ÀÌÁ¤º¹. (1996). ±¹¾î °æ¾î¹ýÀÇ ¸» ´Ü°è º¯µ¿ Çö»ó. »çȸ¾ð¾îÇÐ, 4(1), 51-81.
- ÀÌÁ¤º¹. (2006). ±¹¾î °æ¾î¹ý¿¡ ´ëÇÑ »çȸ¾ð¾îÇÐÀû Á¢±Ù. ±¹¾îÇÐ, 47, 407-448.
- ÀÌÁ¤º¹. (2010). »óȲ ÁÖü ³ôÀÓ "-½Ã-"ÀÇ È®»ê°ú ¹è°æ. ¾ð¾î°úÇבּ¸, 55, 217-246.
- ÀÌâ´ö. (2013). Çö´ë ±¹¾î ºñÀÎĪ Á¸´ë Çö»ó°ú ±× ±³À°Àû ´ëÀÀ ¹æ¾È¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿©. Çѱ¹Ãʵ¾î±³À°, 53, 275-299.
- ÀÓÈ«ºó. (1985). {-½Ã-}¿Í °æÇèÁÖ »óÁ¤ÀÇ ½ÃÁ¡. ±¹¾îÇÐ, 14, 287-336.
- Á¶¿ëÁØ. (2015). Çѱ¹¾î ½ÇÇèÅë»ç·ÐÀÇ ¸ð»ö. ¹Ú»çÇÐÀ§ ³í¹®, °Ç±¹´ëÇб³ ´ëÇпø.
- È«Á¾¼±, °û¼÷¿µ, ±Ç¿ë¹®, ¹®Çý½É, ÀÌÀºÈñ. (2009). ±¹¾î ³ôÀÓ¹ý Ç¥ÇöÀÇ ¹ß´Þ: ±¹¾î ¹®¹ýÀÇ Å½±¸ 2. ¼¿ï: ¹Ú¹®»ç.
- Bard, E. G., Robertson, D., & Sorace, A. (1996). Magnitude estimation of linguistic acceptability. Language, 72(1), 32-68.
- Bernardy, J.-P., Lappin, S., & Lau, J. H. (2018). The influence of context on sentence acceptability judgements. Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), 456-461
- Keller, F. (2000). Gradience in grammar: Experimental and computational aspects of degrees of grammaticality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
- Nagata, H. (1988). The relativity of linguistic intuition: The effect of repetition on grammaticality judgments. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 17(1), 1-17.
- Schütze, C. T., & Sprouse, J. (2014). Judgment data. In D. Sharma & R. J. Podesva (Eds.), Research methods in linguistics (pp. 27-50). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Schütze, C. T. (2016). The empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology. Berlin: Language Science Press.
- Sprouse, J. (2007). A program for experimental syntax: Finding the relationship between acceptability and grammatical knowledge. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Maryland.