대한언어학회 전자저널

Kim, Rhanghyeyun (2019). Labeling and Moving Adjunction Structures. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 27(3), 125-147. Chomskys (2013) labeling algorithm fails to label adjunction structures, resulting in the Full Interpretation problem. This paper shows that the algorithm faces another problem in moving adjunction structures, based on the data from adverb-adjunction and scrambling. This paper then suggests that adverb-adjunction structures as well as scrambling structures can be labeled and thus are correctly predicted to be able to move if we adopt the Anti-Labeling Device of Saito (2016). Finally, Feature-based Labeling alternatives to the Anti-Labeling Device are critically discussed.

# labeling # adverb # scambling # adjunction # Anti-Labeling Device # Feature

• Abe, J. (1993). Binding conditions and scrambling without A/A' distinction, Unpublished doctoral dissertation, UCONN, Storrs, CT.
• Alexiadou, A. (1997). Adverb placement. John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• An, D. H. (2009). A Note on Genitive Drop in Korean. Nanzan Linguistics 5, 1-16.
• Bošković, Ž. (2018). On movement out of moved elements, labels and phases. Linguistic Inquiry, 49, 247-282.
• Bošković, Ž., & Takahashi, D. (1998). Scrambling and last resort. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 347-366.
• Cho, J-H. (1994). Scrambling in Korean: Crossover, reconstruction and binding theory. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, UCONN, Storrs, CT.
• Cho, J-H. (1996). Reconstruction effects and intermediate A-position. Studies in Generative Grammar, 6, 257-279.
• Cho, J-H., & Kim, D-H. (2000). Scrambling without syntactic movement. Studies in Generative Grammar, 10, 151-179.
• Chomsky, N. (1977). On wh-movement. In P. Culicover (Ed,), Formal syntax (pp. 71-132). New York: Academic.
• Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: the framework. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 15.
• Chomsky, Noam. 1999. Derivation by Phase. MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics 18. [In Michael Kenstowicz, (Ed.), 2001, Ken Hale. A Life in Language (pp. 1-52). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
• Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33-49.
• Chomsky, N. (2015). Problems of projection: Extensions. In E. D. Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Structures, strategies and beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti (pp. 3-16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Cinque, G. (1999). Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford University Press.
• Déchaine, R-M. (1993). Predicates across categories. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Massachusettes, Amherst.
• Emonds, J. (1985). A unified theory of syntactic categories. Dordrecht: Foris.
• Epstein, S., Kitahara, H., & Seely, T. D. (2014). Labeling by minimal search: Implications for successive cyclic A-movement and the conception of the postulate “Phase.” Linguistic Inquiry, 45, 463-481.
• Ernst, T. (2002). The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Fanselow, G. (2001). Features, θ-roles, and free constituent order. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 405-437.
• Fukui, N. (1993). Parameters and optionality. Linguistic Inquiry, 24, 399-420.
• Heycock, C. (1992). Layers of predication and the syntax of the copula. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 7, 95–123.
• Hoji, H. (1985). Logical form constraints and configurational structures in Japanese. Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
• Hornstein, N, and J. Nunes. (2008). Adjunction, labeling, and bare phrase structure. Biolinguistics, 2, 57-86.
• Hunter, T. (2010). Relating movement and adjunction in syntax and semantics. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Maryland.
• Ishihara, S. (2001). Stress, focus and scrambling in Japanese. MITWPL 39: A Few From Building E39. Cambridge, MA: MITWPL.
• Jackendoff, R. (1972). Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Jung, Y-J. (2002). Scrambling, edge effects and A/A'-distinction. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 10, 41-64.
• Johnston, J. C., & Park, I-S. (2001). Some problems with a lowering account of scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry, 32, 727-732
• Karimi, S. (1999). Is scrambling as strange as we think it is? In K. Arregi, B. Bruening, C. Krause, & V. Lin (Eds.), MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 33, Papers on morphology and syntax, cycle one (pp. 159-190). Cambridge, MA: MITWPL
• Kitahara, H., (2000). Case and scrambling: A derivational view. Unpublished manuscript, Keio University.
• Ko, H-J. (2007). Asymmetries in scrambling and cyclic linearization. Linguistic Inquiry, 38, 49-83.
• Ko, H-J. (2011). Predication and edge effects. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29, 725-778.
• Ko, H-J. (2014). Edges in syntax: Scrambling and cyclic linearization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Kuroda, S-Y. (1988). Whether we agree or not. Linguisticae Investigationes, 12, 1-47.
• Laenzlinger, C. (1993). Principles for a formal and computational account of adverbial syntax. Unpublished manuscript, Universite de Geneve.
• Larson, R. (1987). Missing pronouns and the analysis of free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry, 18, 239-266.
• Lee, H. (2006). A study on scrambling in Korean: The minimalist approach. Studies in Generative Grammar, 16, 425-460.
• Lee, W-B, and S-E Cho. (2003). Is scrambling EPP-driven? Studies in Generative Grammar, 13, 331-341.
• Lee, Y-S. (1993). Scrambling as case-driven obligatory movement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
• McConnell-Ginet, S. (1982). Adverbs and Logical Form. Language, 58, 144-184.
• Miyagawa, S. (1997). Against optional scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 1-25.
• Miyagawa, S. (2001). The EPP, scrambling, and wh-in-situ. In M. Kesntowicz (Ed.), Ken Hale: A life in language (pp. 293-338). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Miyagawa, S. (2003). A-movement scrambling and options without optionality. In S. Karimi (Ed.), Word order and scrambling (pp. 177-200). Blackwell Publishers.
• Miyagawa, S. (2006). On the ‘undoing’ nature of scrambling: a response to Bošković. Linguistic Inquiry, 37, 607-624.
• Miyagawa, S. (2010). Why Agree? Why Move? Unifying agreement-based and discourse�configurational languages. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Miyagawa, S. (2017). Agreement beyond phi. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
• Miyagawa S., Wu, D., & Koizumi, M. (2018). Deriving Case Theory. Unpublished manuscript, MIT/University of Tokyo, MIT, and Tohoku University.
• Moon, G-S. (2018). Some Remarks on the VP-dislocation analysis of English VP-fronting. Studies in Generative Grammar, 28(1), 233-251.
• Ott, D. (2018). VP-fronting: Movement vs. dislocation. The Linguistic Review, 35(2), 243-282.
• Park, M-K., & Yoo, Y-S. (2019). Scrambling in Korean and the labeling theory. Studies in Modern Grammar 102, 1-30.
• Rijhoek, P. (1994). On adverbs and antisymmetric minimalism. MA Thesis, University of Groningen.
• Saito, M. (1985). Some Asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
• Saito, M. (1992). Long-distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 1, 69-118.
• Saito, M. (2003). A derivational approach to the interpretation of scrambling chains. Lingua, 113, 481-518.
• Saito, M. (2016). (A) Case for Labeling: Labeling in languages without f-feature agreement. The Linguistic Review, 33, 129-175.
• Saito, M., & Fukui, N. (1998). Order in phrase structure and movement. Linguistic Inquiry, 29, 439-474.
• Sportiche, D. (1988). A theory of floating quantifiers and its corollaries for constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 425-449.
• Sportiche, D. (1994). Adjuncts and adjunction. GLOW Newsletter 32, 54-55.
• Stroik, T. (1990). Adverbs as V-sisters. Linguistic Inquiry, 21, 654-661.
• Tada, H. (1993). A/A-bar partition in derivation. Doctoral dissertation, MIT.
• Takano, Y. (1998). Object shift and scrambling. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 16, 817-889.
• Travis, L. (1988). The syntax of adverbs. McGill Working Papers in Linguistics on Comparative Syntax, 280-310.
• Webelhuth, G. (1989). Syntactic saturation phenomena and the modern Germanic languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
• Yang, D-W. & Kim, S-H. (2005). Scrambling and interpretive complex. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 13(2), 169-193.
• Yoo, Y-S.. (2018). Mobility in Syntax: On Contextuality in Labeling and Phases. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Connecticut at Storrs.
• Yoon, J. H-S. (2004). Non-nominative (major) subjects and case stacking in Korean. In P. Bhoskaravao & K. V. Subbarao (Eds.), Nonnominative subjects, 2 (pp. 265-314). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Zubizarreta, M. L. (1982). On the relationship of the lexicon to syntax. Doctoral Dissertation, MIT.
• Zubizarreta, M. L. (1987). Levels of representation in the lexicon and in the syntax, Dordrecht: Foris.