´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ ÀüÀÚÀú³Î

´ëÇѾð¾îÇÐȸ

27±Ç 2È£ (2019³â 6¿ù)

A Diachronic Study of the Positive Influences of Prescriptive Grammar

Shin, Sungkyun

Pages : 131-147

DOI : https://doi.org/10.24303/lakdoi.2019.27.2.131

PDFº¸±â

¸®½ºÆ®

Abstract

Shin, Sungkyun (2019). A diachronic study of the positive influences of prescriptive grammar. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal, 27(2) 131-147. Prescriptive grammar has been influencing English, especially Present-Day English (PE), for the worse and for the better. For the worse, in some instances, it has gone against accepted usage. However, prescriptive grammar influenced English, especially PE, for the better, in that it has helped establish standard and formal language to express authority, sincerity, and certainty, for a language requires many varieties of registers and dialects. As an example, there is the language of sermons, where serious issues are addressed, such as death, eternal life, authority, and majesty. The registers of government policy announcements and court verdicts also require prescriptive expressions. This is not a matter of ideology or social hierarchy, as some misguided linguists charge. Prescriptive grammar just provides standardization, contributing significantly to marking distinctions between dialects and registers.

Keywords

# diachronic # prescriptive # descriptive # register # dialect

References

  • Algeo, J., & Butcher, C. (2014). The origins and development of the English language. 7th Edition. Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
  • Armstrong, N., & Mackenzie, I. (2015). On prescriptivism and ideology. SIRCA Publications Acamicas. 2015.
  • Baugh, A., & Cable, T. (2012). A history of the English language (6th Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,Inc.
  • Cole, S. (2003). The rise of prescriptivism in English. UMM AL-Quraa University Journal of Educational, Social Sciences, 15(2), 117-141.
  • Dinneen, F. (1967). An introduction to general linguistics. NewYork: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  • Hall, R. (1960). Linguistics and your language (originally titled Leave Your Language Alone). New York: Doubleday & Company, Inc.
  • Jespersen, O. (1954. 1909-49). A modern English grammar on historical principles (7 Vols., Reprint). London: Allen and Unwin.
  • Lewis, N. (2011). Word power made easy. New York: Goyal Publishers.
  • International Bible Society. (2007). New International Version (within The Korean-English Study Bible). Seoul: Word of Life Press.
  • Pullum, G. (2004). Ideology, power, and linguistic theory. Modern Language Association Convention. 2004. Thursday, 30 December PMLA, Vol. 119, No. 6, November 2004.
  • Shin, S. (2018). Advantages of the application of English history to English education. English Language and Linguistics 24.3, 69-84.
  • Stavridis, J. (2018). Democracy Isn¡¯t perfect, but it will still prevail. Time. July 12, 2018.
  • Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2011). The bishop\'s grammar: Robert Lowth and the Rise of Prescriptivism. Published to Oxford Scholarship Online: January. DOI:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199579273.001.0001
  • Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2016). The age of prescriptivism\"—Presentation transcript: The Effects of Prescriptivism in Language History 21−22 January 2016. Leiden University Centre for Linguistics
  • Tieken-Boon van Ostade, I. (2019). Usage guides and the age of prescriptivism. Norms and conventions in the history of English. Edited by Birte Bös and Claudia Claridge. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 347. John Benjamins Publishing Co.